Κυριακή 2 Αυγούστου 2009

MARTYR-KING EDMUND OF EAST ANGLIA (+ 869)
and those with him
By Vladimir Moss
St. Edmund, one of the greatest and most famous of the British Saints, lived and suffered during the 9th c., one of the most tragic and difficult moments of British history, when the pagan Danes were killing and destroying over a large part of the British Isles. The problems of the English were made worse by the fact that there was no unity among them, and instead of being united into one powerful force to repel the invaders they were divided into seven kingdoms, which were not always united even within themselves. No part of the country was more exposed to the pagan attacks than the small kingdom of East Anglia, and the old King Offa of East Anglia resolved to go on a pilgrimage to the Holy Land, to pray for the forgiveness of his sins and the safety of his kingdom.
On the way, he visited his cousin Alcmund, who, on being exiled from East Anglia after the death of the Martyr-King Ethelbert (+ May 20, 793), had been entrusted with the kingdom of Old Saxony by the Emperor Charlemagne. Alcmund had married a German Princess named Siwara, and with her often besought the Lord to give him a numerous and saintly family. In answer to his prayer, an Angel appeared to him and told him to undertake a pilgrimage to the tombs of the Apostles in Rome, where God would grant his petition. During this pilgrimage, while the King was one day conversing with his hostess, a noble and pious Roman woman, she noticed on his breast a brilliant sun, whose rays, darting to all four points of the compass, threw a miraculous light on all around. Filled with the spirit of prophecy, she declared that from him would come a son whose fame, like the sun, would illumine the four quarters of the world and bring many to Christ. A few months later, after returning to North Hamburg, the capital of Old Saxony, Alcmund’s wife Siwara bore him his second son, Edmund.
Now when King Offa came to Saxony, Edmund was appointed accompany him; and the old King was immediately struck by the beauty, both physical and spiritual, of the young Prince, and by the zeal of his service. He applied to him the words of Solomon: "Hast thou seen a man swift in his work? He shall stand before kings and shall not be in obscurity" (Proverbs 22.29). Then in the presence of the whole Court he embraced him and, putting a ring on his finger, said: "My most beloved son Edmund, accept this memento of our kinship and mutual love. Remember me as one grateful for your service, for which with God's permission I hope to leave you a paternal inheritance."
Edmund’s father hastened to explain to him the significance of this ceremony: was he prepared to accept King Offa as his adoptive father in place of his natural father? On Edmund’s acceptance, Offa tearfully drew from his finger his ring - in fact, it was a coronation ring - and said: "Son Edmund, observe closely this ring, notice its design and seal. If, when I am far away, I intimate to you by this token my wish and desire, do you without delay execute my order. As the noble assembly here bears witness, I intend to regard you as my most beloved son and heir."
Then Offa continued on his pilgrimage. Having arrived in the Holy Land and venerated the Holy Places, he set out on his return journey via Constantinople. But as he was sailing through the Hellespont, he fell ill; so, disembarking at the Monastery of St. George, he received the Holy Mysteries and prepared for death. His last act was to entrust his kingdom of East Anglia to Edmund, ordering his nobles to take his ring to Saxony as a token of his will. Then he reposed in peace and was buried in St. Geo-rge's Bay on the Hellespont, in the year 854.
And so, in his 14th year, St. Edmund set sail with a retinue of nobles for the promised kingdom, which he had never seen before. They landed at what is now called St. Edmund’s Head, near Hunstanton in Norfolk. Disembarking in a dry river-bed, the King prostrated on the ground and prayed to God to bless his coming and make it profitable for the land and its people. As the Saint rose and mounted his horse, twelve springs of sweet, clear water gushed out of the earth, which worked many miracles of healing for the sick. From that hour the soil of that region, which before had been sandy and barren, bore the richest crops in all Eastern England.
The Saint then proceeded to Attleborough, Offa’s former capital, and staked his claim to the Throne. On November 5, 855, he was in Winchester, attending a Council convened by King Ethelwulf of Wessex (Southern England), to provide a charter of immunities for the English Church. Then he returned to Attleborough, where on Christmas Day he was proclaimed sovereign of the people of Norfolk (the northern half of East Anglia), by Hunbert, Bishop of Elmham.
For the next year the King stayed quietly in Norfolk, learning the Psalms of David under the guidance of Bishop Hunbert. Eventually the people of Suffolk (the southern half of East Anglia), decided to accept him as their King, and on Christmas Day, 856 he was anointed and crowned King of the whole of East Anglia. The Church in Bures, Suffolk, where the coronation took place, survives to the present day.
St. Edmund was fair-haired, tall, well-built, with a natural majesty of bearing. By the piety and chastity of his life he won the respect of all the Christians. He was a defender of the Church, a protector of orphans and widows, and a supporter of the poor. No man sought for justice from him and failed to get redress, and no innocent pleaded in vain for mercy. It is said that under his strong and just rule a boy could drive a mule from Lynn to Sudbury, or from Thetford to Yarmouth, and no one would dare to molest him.
But in 865 the pagan Danes, led by the three brothers Hinguar, Healfdene and Hubba, again invaded England, bent on revenge for the death of their father Ragnar Lodbrog, at the hands of the English King Alle of Northumbria. Hinguar carried with him the famous standard of the Raven, which had been woven by the three daughters of Lodbrog for their three brothers. Magical spells had been cast during the weaving, so that when the bird flapped its wings in the wind, it was believed to betoken victory, while when it hung motionless, it betokened defeat. St. Edmund went out to meet the Danes under another banner, which showed Adam and Eve eating from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil and above them the Lamb of God slain to wash away their sins.
Edmund defeated the enemy in several skirmishes, showing subtlety no less than valour. Thus he was once surprised by the enemy within one of his camps with no avenue of escape. The siege was so long that both besiegers and besieged began to suffer from famine. But Edmund determined that the enemy should not learn about his men’s suffering, which might persuade them to disband their own troops. So he ordered a fatted bull which had been fed with good wheat to be set loose outside the enclosure. The Danes seized it and killed it. And when they opened its stomach and found fresh wheat inside, they concluded that the English had no lack of provisions. So they abandoned the siege and split up into foraging parties. Edmund then followed them stealthily, and killed large numbers of them.
On another occasion Edmund and his men were besieged inside the almost impregnable fortress of Framingham. However, Hinguar captured an old and decrepit man by the name of Sathonius, whom the Saint had been feeding and accommodating at his own expense in the castle. By means of a bribe, the old man was induced to betray to Hinguar a weak spot in the castle walls, which he himself had helped to build in his youth. Advancing on the castle at this point, Hinguar caught the English by surprise. Edmund jumped onto his swiftest charger and galloped out through the open gates. Some of the Danes saw him, but did not suspect who he was and galloped after him, hoping to get some information about the King. But Edmund, like St. Athanasius the Great on a similar occasion, turned to them and said: "Go back as fast as you can, for, when I was in the castle, the King whom you seek was there also." Turning back, they discovered that the King had fooled them. Then St. Edmund gathered his forces and fell upon the baffled Danes as they were retreating.
The Danes now made peace with Edmund and headed north to Northumbria (North-Eastern England), arriving in York on November 1, 866. The English Kings Osbert and Alle, who had been fighting each other up to that moment, now joined forces and marched on York, and after destroying the city walls they entered the city on March 21, 867. However, the resultant battle within the city was disastrous for the English: both kings and eight of the leading noblemen were killed. The Danes then ravaged the whole of Northumbria as far as the River Tyne before installing an Englishman named Egbert as puppet-King of the region under their power.
This was only "the beginning of sorrows" for the English. At the end of the year the Danish "Great Army" moved south into Mercia (Central England) and took the city of Nottingham. In answer to King Burhred of Mercia’s appeal for help, King Ethelred of Wessex, his younger brother Alfred (the future King of England) and St. Edmund came to meet him outside the walls of Nottingham. However, the Danes avoided a battle with the English Kings outside Nottingham, so peace terms were concluded. In exchange for giving up Nottingham, the Great Army was allowed to retreat back into Northumbria.
Now began a horrific despoliation of the Christian inheritance of the whole of Eastern England. In the north, St. Ebba’s Monastery at Coldingham was burned down with the nuns inside after they had all, with their Abbess Ebba giving them the lead, cut off their noses and upper lips to deter the attackers from raping them. Tynemouth, Wearmouth, Jarrow, Whitby and other famous monasteries were destroyed; and in Eastern Mercia Bardney and Crowland were gutted.
When the news of the Great Army’s approach reached Abbot Theodore of Crowland, he ordered all the able-bodied men to leave with the Holy Relics and the Monastery’s jewels and charters, while he buried the altar-stone and gold and silver plate in a wall of the Church. However, before leaving they decided to celebrate the Divine Liturgy. As the flames of nearby Kesteven lit up the sky, Abbot Theodore calmly celebrated with the assistance of the Priests Askega and Lethwin, Deacon Alfget, Subdeacon Sabinus and the Monks Grimkell, Agamund, Hereberht, Ecgdred and Ulric, together with 70 others. Hardly had they finished when the Danish leader Oscytel burst in and beheaded the Abbot at the altar. Then they tortured the elder monks, trying to get them to disclose where they had hidden the Monastery’s treasures. But none of them cooperated, so they were all killed with the exception of a ten-year-old novice called Turgar. The Danes then opened the tomb of St. Guthlac, but, finding nothing, heaped the Relics and the contents of the tombs into a pile and then burned them, together with the bodies of the dead monks and the Church and Monastery buildings. This took place on August 26, 869.
Then it was the turn of the fenland monasteries Thorney, Peterborough, Ramsey and Ely. At Thorney the Holy Hermits Tancred, Torthred and Tova (two brothers and a sister) were killed. At Peterborough Hinguar was struck by a stone; so his brother Hubba with his own hand slaughtered Abbot Hedda and 84 monks on one stone to avenge his injury. The Monastery, “which once was rich, was reduced to nothing.” At Ely a Dane took hold of the pall which covered the incorrupt body of St. Etheldreda (+ June 23, 679) and struck the marble of the tomb with his battle-axe. But a splinter flew back from off the ground and entered the striker’s eye, and he fell dead. At this the others left the tombs of the other Saints, which they were thinking of violating, and fled.
Another Saint resisted the invaders in a different way. The body of St. Werburga (+ 3 February, c. 700) had been preserved incorrupt at Chester right up to the coming of the Danes. But when they approached the city, the body suddenly disintegrated!
While Hubba with 10,000 men was sacking Ely and Soham, Hinguar pressed eastwards into East Anglia. On Newmarket Heath he encountered Ulfcetyl defending two or three earthworks later known a “Holy Edmund’s Fortifications”. But the English were overwhelmed and slaughtered to a man. Then the host proceeded to the capital of East Anglia, Thetford, which they captured amidst terrible scenes of rape and butchery. The whole population of the city was killed, and only King Edmund with a small army survived to face the Danes.
Hinguar then sent a messenger to Edmund, saying: “Hinguar our King, brave and victorious by sea and by land, has subdued many nations and has now landed suddenly here with his host. Now he orders you to divide your hidden treasure and the wealth of your ancestors with him quickly. And if you want to live, you can be his under-king, because you do not have the power to resist him.”
Then Edmund summoned Bishop Hunbert and discussed with him how he should answer Hinguar. The Bishop, fearful because of the disaster at Thetford and the threat to the King’s life, counselled him to submit to whatever Hinguar demanded. The King was silent for a while, looking at the ground. Then he said: “O Bishop! This wretched nation is humiliated, and I would rather die in battle against him who is trying to possess my people’s land.” Then the Bishop said: “Alas, dear King, your people lie slaughtered, and you do not have the forces to fight. And these pirates will come and bind you alive, unless you save your life by fleeing, or by submitting to him in this way.” The King replied: “What I want and desire with all my heart is that I should not be left alone when my beloved nobles with their wives and children have been suddenly killed by these pirates. It was never my custom to flee, and I would rather die for my country if I have to. And Almighty God knows that I will never renounced His worship, nor His true love, in life or in death.”
Then he turned to Hinguar’s messenger and said: “You would certainly deserve to die right now, but I will not dirty my clean hands in your filthy blood, for I follow Christ, Who set us this example. And I will gladly be killed by you if God so ordains it. Go quickly now and tell your savage lord: ‘Edmund will never while living submit in this land to the pagan war-lord Hinguar, unless he first submit in this land to Christ the Saviour in faith.”
Then Edmund marched with his men to Thetford. The battle raged for seven hours on the plain between Melford and Carford bridges; and finally Hinguar and his men retreated to their entrenched camp. Edmund was the victor, but at a terrible cost; and as he marched back to Hoxne he resolved to give himself up rather than continue the bloody carnage.
Shortly after his arrival in Hoxne, the news came of a fresh Danish inroad into the country. Hubba had completed his destruction of Ely and Soham, and had now set out with 10,000 more men to help his brother complete the conquest of East Anglia. Resistance was now hopeless, and Edmund’s only thought was how to preserve his country from further bloodshed and preserve it in the Christian faith. Bishop Hunbert again counselled flight, if only in the hope that he might return to reconquer the land for Christ. But Edmund knew that the enemy would the more ruthlessly put to sword any able-bodied man who might assist in his restoration. Moreover, Hinguar had a personal hatred of him which would be satisfied only by his being captured alive… So the Saint turned to Hunbert and said: “O Bishop Hunbert, my father, it is necessary that I alone should die for my people, and that the whole nation should not perish” (cf. John 12.50).
Then, having dismissed his men and laid aside his arms, he entered the Church and prostrated himself in front of the altar, praying for strength for his feat of martyrdom for Christ and his suffering people.
Having marched up to the town (Framlingham, according to one source, “Haegilsdun”, according to another) and surrounded it, Hinguar demanded that Edmund renounce his kingdom and his religion. Then he sent his men into the Church with orders to touch no one except the King. They seized him, bound him, and beat him with cudgels while insulting him continually. Then they tied him to a tree and flogged him with whips for a long time. Meanwhile the King called unceasingly on the name of Christ. This infuriated the pagans, and they now shot at him with arrows “until he bristled like a hedgehog”, like the Holy Martyr Sebastian. When Hinguar saw that the Holy King would not renounce Christ, he ordered him to be beheaded. And so they dragged him, still calling on Christ, to the place of slaughter and there beheaded him. Then Bishop Hunbert, too, was led into the arena and beheaded. This took place on November 20, 869, when St. Edmund had reigned for fifteen years and was twenty-nine years old.
The pagans returned to their ships, having thrown the head of St. Edmund into dense brambles so that it would be left unburied. Then the local inhabitants came and found the headless body, but could not find the head. A man who had been a witness of the martyrdom said that he thought they had hidden the head somewhere in the wood. So a search-party was organised, which scoured the bushes and brambles. Then the Saint himself helped them: as the men were calling to each other, the holy Head cried: “Here! Here! Here!”, leading them to the place. And there they saw it lying between the two paws of a grey wolf, who, while not daring to harm it himself, had been protecting it from the other wild beasts. Thanking God Almighty for His miracles, the people took the Holy Head and carried it back to the town. The wolf followed them as if he were tame, and then, having seen it into the town, returned to the woods. The people joined the head back onto the body, and then buried it as best they could, hastily erecting a wooden Chapel over it….
Early in the 10th c., the process of the reconquest of England from the Danes was well under way. The Danish rulers accepted Holy Baptism, and East Anglia was ruled by a Dane, Eric, under the suzerainty of the All-English King Edward the Elder. In 915 a miracle drew the attention of the liberated people to their last Christian King, St. Edmund. One night, a blind man and a boy who was leading him were walking through the woods near Hoxne. Not seeing any house nearby, they resolved to stay the night in what was in fact the wooden Chapel constructed over St. Edmund’s grave. Upon entering, they stumbled across the Martyr’s grave. They were terrified, but decided not to leave but to stay in the Chapel, using the grave as a pillow for the night. Hardly had they closed their eyes, when a column of light suddenly illumined the whole place. The boy woke up his master in fear. “Alas!, alas!” he cried, “our lodging is on fire!” But the blind man calmed him down, assuring him that their host, St. Edmund, would not let them come to harm. And indeed, at daybreak they discovered to their astonishment that through St. Edmund’s prayers the blind man was able to see.
The news of this miracle spread throughout East Anglia, and the people resolved to translate the body of their Saint to a safer and more honourable shrine. They chose the town of Bedricsworth (now Bury St. Edmunds), whose Church and Monastery, founded by St. Sigebert in the 7th c., had been destroyed by the Danes. However, some of the Priests still survived. In 951 when the Church had been rebuilt, Bishop Theodred of Elmham and the whole clergy of East Anglia inspected the holy body, testified to its incorruption, reclothed it and then translated it with great ceremony into its new shrine.
“Then there was a great miracle,” writes Abbot Aelfric, “in that he was just as whole as if he were alive, with unblemished body; and his neck, which was previously cut through, was healed, and there was, as it were, a red silken thread about his neck as an indication to men of how he was slain. Likewise the wounds which the savage heathens had made in his body with repeated missiles were healed by the heavenly God. And he lies incorrupt thus to this present day [about the year 1000], awaiting resurrection and eternal glory. His body, which lies there undecayed, proclaims to us that he lived here in the world without fornication, and journeyed to Christ with a pure life. A certain widow called Oswyn lived in prayer and fasting at the Saint’s tomb for many years afterwards; each year [on Holy Thursday] she would cut the hair of the Saint and cut his nails, circumspectly, with love, and keep them on the altar in a shrine as Relics.”
Many miracles continued to be performed at the Saint’s tomb. At night a column of light was often seen rising above it and illumining the whole Church. In 925, King Athelstan founded a community of four Priests and two Deacons to look after the shrine.
“Then,” continues Abbot Aelfric, “the inhabitants venerated the Saint with faith, and Bishop Theodred [the second of that name, called “the Good”] endowed the monastery with gifts of gold and silver, in honour of the Saint. Then at one time there came wretched thieves, eight in a single night, to the venerable Saint; they wanted to steal the treasures which men had brought there, and tried how they could get in by force. One struck at the bolt violently with a hammer; one of them filed around it with a file; one also dug under the door with a spade; one of them with a ladder wanted to unlock the window. But they laboured in vain and fared miserably, inasmuch as the holy man miraculously bound them, each as he stood, striving with his tool, so that none of them could commit that sinful deed nor move away from there, but they stood thus till morning. Then marvelled at how the villains hung there, one up a ladder, one bent in digging, and each was bound fast in his labour. Then they were all brought to the Bishop, and he ordered them all to be hung on a high gallows. But he was not mindful of how the merciful God spoke through His Prophet the following words: “Eos qui ducuntur ad mortem eruere ne cesses, Always redeem those whom they lead to death”; and also the Holy Canons forbid those in orders, both Bishops and Priests, to be concerned with thieves, for it is not proper that those who are chosen to serve God should be a party to a man’s death, if they are the Lord’s servants. Then after Bishop Theodred had examined the books, he repented, with lamentation, that he had appointed so cruel a judgement to those wretched thieves, and regretted it to the end of his life, and earnestly prayed the people to fast with him a whole three days, praying to the Almighty that he would have mercy on him.
There was in that land a certain man called Leofstan, powerful before the world and foolish before God, who rode to the Saint with great arrogance, and insolently ordered them to show him whether the Holy Saint was uncorrupted; but as soon as he saw the Saint’s body, he immediately went insane and roared savagely and ended miserably by an evil death.
From the year 999 the incorrupt body of St. Edmund was in the care of a monk named Ethelwine. In 1010, related Abbot Sampson, when the Danes were again ravaging East Anglia, the Saint appeared to Ethelwine and ordered him to place his body in a casket, put it on a cart and convey it to London. But the clerics were to remain in their places.
At dusk one day, as Ethelwine was proceeding on his way to London, he came to the house of a Priest named Edbriht, and asked hospitality for himself and the Holy Body of the Saint. The Priest at first refused to give shelter to strangers; but eventually, after people protested, he allowed the monk to sleep in the open air on his land, while not allowing him into his house. So Ethelwine slep under the cart on which the Holy Martyr’s body lay.
That night, however, a column of light was seen stretching up from the cart to heaven, and during the fourth watch of the night, the cart began to make a noise as if its wheels were turning. Startled by the noise, Ethelwine woke up and understood that the Saint wished to move from there. Soon he was on his way, and when he was already some distance from the house, he looked back and saw that it was on fire – a just retribution for the Priest’s inhumanity.
Later that day, Ethelwine came to the crossing of the River Stratford, three miles from London, and wished to cross over. But part of the bridge had subsided into the river, and the whole structure was unsafe. The Danes were threatening from the rear, and there was no other crossing. So Ethelwine resorted to prayer. Suddenly the cart began to move of its own will. The right wheel rolled over what remained of the bridge, while the left wheel passed through the air above the water as if it were dry land. Those who saw the miracle from the other side of the river praised God, and as the Holy Body approached the outskirts of London a great crowd of monks, clerics and nobles came to meet it. Taking it upon their shoulder, they moved towards the Church of St. Paul, singing praises and rejoicing greatly.
Between the Aldgate (a gate in the walls of London) and the Church of St. Paul, 18 people were cured of various maladies through the prayers of the Saint. A woman who was confined to her bed with paralysis heard the clamour accompanying the passing of the Saint and asked her servants what it signified. “Don’t you know,” they said, “St. Edmund, the King of the East Angles, who was innocently killed for Christ by the unfaithful and impious pagans, has come into this city and has given health to many!” “Woe is me!” she cried, “that God has not counted me worthy to obtain mercy in his presence. For if I could just touch the edge of his bier, I am confident that I would be immediately healed of my infirmity.” So saying, she suddenly stood on her feet completely healed – the nineteenth healing to the glory of the Saint that day. Realising what had happened, she rushed into the crowd and with tears pressed her lips to the saint’s bier.
Now the procession came to the Church of St. Gregory, near St. Paul’s. The Holy Body was let down and all the people prostrated in prayer to the Saint. At this point a certain Dane who was curious to know what was happening came on the scene. Seeing the others prostrate in prayer, he proudly remained upright, and, drawing aside the veil which covered the body, he peered inside. Suddenly he was struck with blindness. Then, realising his sin, he confessed it, promised amendment of life and faithfulness to God and St. Edmund, and implored forgiveness. All those present joined their prayer to his, and his sight was restored. Then he took off his golden armlets and offered them to the saint. Moreover, he was as good as his word and led a pious life thereafter.
For almost three years the fame of the Martyr spread far and wide through the miracles of healing, both physical and spiritual, wrought through his intercession in London.
Then St. Edmund appeared in a vision to Ethelwine and ordered him to bring his body back to Bury St. Edmunds. Immediately the monk went to Bishop Alfhun with a request to leave, explaining that he had come to London rather as a pilgrim, than as a permanent resident. The Bishop acceded to his request, though reluctantly. But when Ethelwine, had gone, he hastened with three clerics to the Church of St. Gregory. There they tried to lift the Holy Body in its reliquary onto their shoulders. But to no avail: the weight was insupportable. Four more men joined them, then twelve, then twenty-four. But after much sweat and labour they had not succeeded in moving the reliquary a single inch. Then the Bishop with his men felt ashamed, realizing that their devotion, though pious, was contrary to the will of God and St. Edmund. When Ethelwine came up, however, and prayed in the presence of the Saint, he was able with three of his companions to life the reliquary as though it weighed nothing.
So he set out on his journey, but not unnoticed as before. For a great crowd of clergy and people followed him in great sorrow as far as the Stratford bridge, and beyond it all the villages along the route poured out to meet the Saint with great joy. Bridges were repaired and roads cleared. And, as in London, many miracles took place. Near Stapleford, the lord of the village gave hospitality to the Saint and was cured of a chronic illness; whereupon he donated a manor to the Saint in perpetuity. Finally, the holy treasure was received by the clerics of Bury St. Edmunds and placed with all devotion in its former resting-place. There, for centuries to come, miracles did not cease for those who sought with faith.
In the year 1013, the Danes under King Swein again invaded England, and the whole country north of Watling Street surrendered to him. London, however, under the leadership of King Ethelred and Earl Thurkill, held out against him for some time. But when Swein turned northwards again, the whole nation accepted him as their undisputed King, and even the Londoners were forced to submit, while the King, the Royal Family and Bishop Alfhun of London went into exile in Normandy.
In 1014 Swein came to Bury St. Edmunds, demanding tribute and threatening that if it was not paid he would burn the town with the townsfolk, destroy the Church of the Saint from its foundations and torture the clerics in various ways. But the townsfolk refused, trusting in the protection of St. Edmund. Nor did the tax-collectors dare to use force against them, for they had heard how the Saint protected his own. So they hastened to the King and informed him of the rebellion against his authority. Meanwhile, not only the townsfolk of Bury St. Edmunds, but also people from all over East Anglia hastened to the Church of the Saint to beseech him by prayers, fasting and almsgiving to free the land from the yoke that had been imposed upon it for ten years or more. Moreover, they asked Monk Ethelwine to make a special intercession for them at the shrine of the Saint, that he would in his accustomed manner reveal a means of salvation for them through a nocturnal visitation.
That night, therefore, St. Edmund appeared to Ethelwine in his sleep, with joyful countenance and in shining white garments, and said: "Go to King Swein and tell him this from me: 'Why do you vex my little flock by imposing on them a yoke that no other King has imposed upon them? Tribute has never been demanded of, nor paid by, them at any time since my repose. Therefore correct this unjust sentence, lest, when you wish to, you will be unable to. For if you do not obey my admonition, you will soon know that you displease both God and myself; for you will discover that East Anglia has me as her protector.'"
So Ethelwine obediently sought out King Swein at Gainsborough, and humbly doing obeisance, delivered the Saint’s message, mixing soft words with the harsh. But the King refused to listen, ordered the monk out of his sight, and showered the Saint with abuse, saying that he had no holiness. Seeing that the King had no fear of God nor reverence for the Saint, Ethelwine sadly turned back. Near Lincoln he was given hospitality for the night; and as he was sleeping the Saint appeared to him and said: "Why are you fearful and sad? Have you forgotten my words and incurred the risk of falling into despair? Rise immediately and continue your journey; for before you will have reached its end, news about King Swein will delight you and all your compatriots."
Strengthened by this revelation, Ethelwine rose and set off on his way before dawn. As he was travelling he heard the sound of Danish horsemen behind him. One came up, greeted him, and said:
"By your leave, are you the Priest whom I saw the day before yesterday delivering the orders of a certain King to King Swein?"
"I am."
"Alas, alas," he said, "how weighty was your threat! How true your prophecy! For the death of King Swein has left England glad and Denmark in mourning. The night after you left, the King went to bed happy and fearing nothing. The whole palace was sleeping soundly. Suddenly the King was woken up by an unknown soldier standing before him, a man of wondrous beauty and brandishing arms. Addressing the King by his own name, he said: “Do you want tribute from St. Edmund’s land, O King? Get up - here it is.” He got up but fell back on his bed, terrified at the sight of the arms, and began to cry out. Then the soldier went up to him, thrust him through with his lance and left. Hearing his cry: “Help! Help! St. Edmund has come to kill me!”, his men came rushing in and found him dead, covered in his own blood."
Marianus relates that at that moment in Essex, a pious man named Wulfmar who had been ill for three days with a disease that deprived him of the use of his tongue and of all his limbs, suddenly sat up on his bed in the presence of his parents and neighbours, and said:
"On this night and at this hour King Swein has been killed, pierced through with the lance of St. Edmund."
Saying this, he fell back on his bed and died.
When Ethelwine heard this news, he judged the time opportune to publish what he had previously covered in silence. The story then spread like wildfire throughout the province, inciting all the English to refuse to pay tribute. King Swein perished on February 2, 1014, and his body was placed in salt and shipped back to Denmark.Thus was the Scripture fulfilled: “The Saints shall boast in glory, and they shall rejoice upon their beds. The high praise of God shall be in their throat, and two-edged swords shall be in their hands, to do vengeance among the heathen, punishments among the peoples, to bind their kings with fetters, and their nobles with manacles of iron, to do among them the judgement that is written. This glory shall be to all His saints” (Psalm 149.5-9).
In 1032, the body of St. Edmund was once more inspected and its incorruption verified, this time by Archbishop Aethelnoth of Canterbury and in the presence of witnesses. Further inspections and verifications took place in 1050, 1095 and 1198.
From the 16th c. the French Abbey of St. Sernin, Toulouse claimed to be in possession of the Holy Relics. In the 20th c. these were returned to England. Howe-ver, a controversy arose over their authenticity, and in 1994 a committee was set up to examine the question. No conclusion has yet been reached.

Sources:
Abbot Aelfic, Passio Sancti Eadmundi, Regis et Martyris, translated in Michael Swanton (ed.), Anglo-Saxon Prose, London: Dent, 1975, pp. 97-102;
Anglo-Saxon Chronicle, E, 1013;
Nova Legende Anglie, Appendix II, pp. 596-602;
Rev. J.B. Mackinlay, Saint Edmund, King and Martyr, London: Art & Book Company, 1893;
Trefor (Fr. Elias) Jones, The English Saints: East Anglia, Norwich: Canterbury Press, 1999, pp. 135-157.

SAINT SWITHUN, BISHOP OF WINCHESTER (+ 862)

By Vladimir Moss

Our holy Father Swithun was born in Wessex in the ninth century and educated at the Old Minster in Winchester. He was chosen by Egbert, King of Wessex (802-839), to be his chaplain, and to be the educator of his son Ethelwulf, who became king in 839. In 852 St. Swithun became Bishop of Winchester.
In 853 King Ethelwulf sent his five-year-old son Alfred, the future founder of the All-English monarchy, on a pilgrimage to Rome. He was escorted by St. Swithun. Pope Leo IV endowed the young prince with the insignia and dignity of a Roman consul. According to the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle, he even consecrated Alfred as king and stood sponsor for him at confirmation, just as his father Ethelwulf had requested when he sent him thither. But this is disputed by historians.
In 854 King Ethelwulf determined to give a tenth part of the lands throughout all my kingdom to Holy Church. This charter was signed, after the king, by St. Swithun. His signature is also on other royal gifts of land to the Church.
It was a very difficult time for the English people as the pagan Vikings invaded the land and spread death and destruction far and wide. In 860 a great naval force even stormed the city of Winchester itself, but was later defeated. Swithun not only protected the kingdom by his prayers, but is also credited with building the bridge at the east end of the city.
Once, when he was visiting the workmen at the bridge, the saint saw a poor woman carrying eggs back home in her basket. She dropped the basket, and, to her great distress, the eggs broke. However, the holy bishop, taking pity on her, restored the eggs whole and unbroken to the basket.
It is at about this time that an Anglo-Saxon poem called Judith was composed; it has been described as one of the noblest poems in the whole range of Old English Literature, combining the highest dramatic and constructive power with the utmost brilliance of language and metre. Professor Cook of Yale University thinks that it was composed by St. Swithun himself in about the year 856 in gratitude for the deliverance of Wessex from the fury of the Vikings and dedicated to Judith, wife of King Ethelwulf. In the poem the Vikings are represented by the Assyrians, the English by the Jews, and Queen Judith by her namesake in the Bible story.
St. Swithun died on July 2, 862, and was buried in a simple grave outside the west door of the old cathedral. The grave was identified and marked by archaeologists in 1971.
For over a hundred years, his memory was forgotten, and, as he wished, people walked over his grave on their way to church without knowing who it was they were stepping on. But the Lord did not wish this light to remain hidden under a bushel. And on July 15, 971 his relics were translated into the cathedral to the accompaniment of a greater outpouring of miracles than had ever been seen in Orthodox England.
About twenty years later, this event was recorded by Abbot Aelfric: For three years before the saint was translated into the church from the stone coffin which now stands inside the new building, he appeared in a vision to a certain faithful blacksmith, wonderfully arrayed, and said: Do you know the priest Edsige, who with other priests was driven out of the old monastery by Bishop Ethelwold for their misconduct? The smith then answered the venerable Swithun as follows: I knew him long ago, sir, but he left this place, and I do not know for certain where he is living now. Then the holy man said again to the old smith: He is now living in Winchcombe. This is the truth. And now I adjure you in the name of Christ: go quickly and give this message, that Swithun the bishop has commanded him to go to Bishop Ethelwold and say that he must himself open my grave and bring my bones inside the church; for he has been counted worthy that in his time I should be made known to men. Then the smith said to him: O sir, Edsige will not believe my words. Then the bishop said again: Let him go to my grave and pull a ring out of the coffin; and if the ring yields at the first tug then he will know for certain that I have sent you to him. If the ring will not come away easily, then he will by no means accept what I say. And after that tell him that he must amend his ways in accordance with the will of the Lord, and hasten single-mindedly to eternal life. And tell everyone that as soon as they open my grave they will find such a valuable hoard that their precious gold will be as nothing in comparison. Then holy Swithun vanished from the smiths sight.
However, he did not dare to tell anyone about this vision, fearing to be regarded as an untruthful messenger. So the holy man spoke to him again, and yet a third time, and severely reproved him for not acting in obedience to his commands. Then at last the smith went to his burial-place, and, albeit fearfully, took hold of the ring, crying out to God: O Lord God, the Creator of all things, grant me, a sinner, to pull this ring out of the lid, if he who spoke to me three times in a dream is really lying here inside. Then he pulled the iron out of the stone as easily as if it had stood in sand, and wondered greatly at what had happened. Then he put it back in the hole and pressed it in with his foot. Again it stuck so firmly that no one was able to pull it out. The smith went away awestruck, and in the market-place he met a serf of Edsiges, to whom he related exactly what Swithun had commanded him to report it to his master.
The serf consented, but at first did not dare to tell his master, until he felt that no good would come from concealing the saint’s command. Then he told him in order what Swithun had commanded. Now at that time Edsige avoided Bishop Ethelwold and all the monks who were in the minster because of his ejection by then. So he did not obey the saints command, although the saint was a blood-relative of his. Within two years, however, he retreated to that same monastery, and by the grace of God became a monk, continuing there until he departed this life. Blessed is Almighty God, Who humbles the proud while exalting the humble to high estate, and corrects the sinful while always preserving the good who hope in Him.
Again, there was a certain poor peasant, awfully hunch-backed and bent over in consequence, to whom it was revealed in a dream that he would obtain bodily health and recovery from his crippled state at Swithuns sepulchre. And so he arose joyfully in the morning, crept on two crutches to Winchester and sought the saint as he had been instructed, praying for his health on bended knee. Then he was healed by the holy bishop, so that no trace of the hump which had oppressed him could be seen. At that time the monks did not know about St. Swithun, thinking that some other saint had healed the man. But the peasant said that it was Swithun who had healed him, for he knew best about the matter.
A certain man was afflicted with a very distressing disease, so that he could hardly open his eyes or utter a word, but lay in torment thus, despairing of his life. Then all his friends wanted to carry him to the New Minster, to [the relics of] St. Judoc, so that he could recover his health there. But someone told them that it would be better to take the sick man to the Old Minster, to Swithuns grave. This they did, and that night they kept vigil at the grave with him, praying to Almighty God to grant the sick man health through St. Swithun. The sick man also watched until daybreak. Then he fell asleep, and it seemed to all of them as if the tomb was rocking, while to him it seemed as if someone was dragging one of his shoes off his feet. Suddenly he awoke, healed by the holy Swithun. They looked carefully for the shoe, but no one could find it. So they returned home with the man who had been healed.
Through the power of God eight sick men were miraculously healed at the holy tomb before the body was removed from it.
After these signs, King Edgar desired the holy mans exhumation, and told the venerable Ethelwold to translate it with great pomp. Then Bishop Ethelwold, accompanied by abbots and monks, took up the saint and and bore him into the church of St. Peter. There he remains in honour, working miracles. Then within three days four sick men were healed by the holy man; and there were few days within the next five months in which at least three sick people were not healed sometimes five or six, or seven or eight, ten or twelve, sixteen or eighteen. Within ten days two hundred men had been healed, and so many within twelve months that no one could count them. The cemetery was filled with cripples, so that the people could hardly get into the minster. And within a few days they were all so miraculously healed that one could not find a sick man in the whole of that vast crowd.
At that time there lived in the Isle of Wight three women, two of whom had been blind for nine years, and the third had never seen the light of the sun. With some difficulty they obtained a dumb guide and came to the saint, and watched there for one night, and were healed, both the blind woman and the dumb guide. Then the boy told the sacristan, saying that he had never been able to speak before, and asking for the appointed hymn of praise to be sung.
At about the same time a certain bondwoman was caught and sentenced to be flogged for some very minor fault. She was put in custody until the morning, when she was to be severely beaten. All night she lay awake, weeping and calling on the holy Swithun to help her, the wretched one, praying that through the power of God he would deliver her from the cruel stripes. When dawn broke, and they began to sing the Praises, the fetters on her feet suddenly fell off, and she ran, with hands still bound, to the church and the blessed saint, in accordance with his will. Then her lord came after her and freed her, loosing her bonds, for the sake of St. Swithun.
A certain nobleman had lain crippled by paralysis for many years, being unable to move from his bed. Then he said that he wanted to travel to Winchester, if only in his horse-litter, and pray for his healing. While he was saying this to his servants and friends, he was cured. Nevertheless, he made his way to the saint on foot, travelling in front of the company for the whole journey, and earnestly thanked the saint for his recovery.
On one day, twenty-five men suffering from various diseases came to the saint, imploring him to help them. Some were blind, some lame, some deaf and some dumb. They were all healed at the same time through the saints intercession.
There was a certain very rich nobleman who went suddenly blind. He travelled to Rome to pray to the holy Apostles for a cure. For four whole years he stayed in Rome, but was not healed. Then he heard of St. Swithun, and of the miracles he had wrought since the nobleman had left England. Travelling back in haste, he came to the holy man and was healed there, returning home with perfect sight.
Another man, continues Abbot Aelfric, had been blind for seven whole years. He had a guide who led him everywhere. One day he went out, but the guide became angry and left him. At a loss how to return home, the blind man cried out to god and St. Swithun in great anguish. He was immediately healed and returned home joyfully without a guide, for which his relatives thanked God fervently.
Then the venerable and blessed Ethelwold, who was the bishop of Winchester at that time, commanded all the monks who were living in the monastery to go in procession to the church and praise the saint with hymns, and in this way to magnify God because of the great saint every time a sick man was healed. This they did immediately, and sang the Te Deum so often sometimes three, sometimes four times in a night that they came to hate getting up to do this, as they wanted to go on sleeping. At length they gave up the chanting altogether, for the bishop was busy with the king and had no means of knowing that they were not chanting the Te Deum continually. Then St. Swithun himself came, wonderfully adorned, to a certain good man, and said: Go now to the Old Minster and tell the monks that God very much dislikes their murmuring and sloth, for they see God’s wonders among them every day but will not praise Christ with chanting as the bishop told the brethren to do. And tell them that if they do not sing the hymn, immediately the miracles will cease. However, if they sing the Te Deum every time a miracle is performed and a sick man is healed, then so many miracles will be wrought among them that no one will be able to remember so many miracles having been wrought in his lifetime by anyone. Then the man awoke from that joyous sleep, lamenting that he could no longer see the bright light which he had seen around St. Swithun. He arose, however, and went quickly to Bishop Ethelwold, and told him all that had happened. Ethelwold then immediately sent from the kings court to the monks, and told them to sing the Te Deum as he had commanded, with the warning that anyone who neglected this would heavily atone for it by seven days continuous fasting. From that time they always observed this custom, as we ourselves have very often seen; for we have not infrequently sung this hymn with them.
A certain man was unjustly accused of stealing, and sentenced to having his eyes put out and his ears cut off. He was immediately seized and the sentenced carried out. Then the blood ran down into his head so that he could not hear, and he continued blind and deaf for seven months. Until, that is, he went in faith to St. Swithun, and sought out his relics, and prayed to him that he would at least receive his hearing; for he did not believe that he would ever recover his sight. And he said that he had been unjustly punished in this way. Then through Swithuns intercession a wonder of God was wrought in that man so that he saw clearly with perfect eyes, although they had been thrust out of their sockets and one ball removed entirely, while the other hung down his cheek. He was also granted good hearing he who had formerly possessed neither eyes nor hearing.
However, we should understand that we should not pray to Gods saints as to God Himself, for He alone is God and above all things; but we should truly pray to the saints to intercede with the omnipotent God, Who is their Lord, that He may come to our aid.
Once some men were keeping vigil beside a corpse in the customary manner, when a fool, as if in jest, told them with unseemly laughter that he was Swithun. You may know that I am in fact Swithun who work these miracles, and it is my will that you bring your candles to me and prostrate yourselves, and I shall grant you your desire. He foolishly blasphemed in this way for a long time until the suddenly fell to the ground, silenced, and as if dead. Immediately they carried him home to his bed, where he lay for a long time, confessing that he had presumptuously spoken foolish words, and asking forgiveness from the saint. And by the saintβs intercession he was healed.
A certain noblemans servant had a sudden fall from his horse, so that his arm and left leg were broken. And he was so crushed that he immediately thought that he would die. He had been previously very dear to his lord, and the lord was in great sorrow for his servant, and besought the Almighty from his inmost heart to help the man through the great Swithun. And he also appealed to Swithun, crying out in sorrow: O holy Swithun, pray to Jesus that He may grant life to this sick servant. If He does this through you, I shall be more faithful to the living God all the days of my life. Then the servant arose, made whole through St. Swithun. Then the lord rejoiced, and with faith gave praise to God.
A certain old nobleman in the Isle of Wight had lain bedridden for some nine years, and could not leave his bed without being carried. Two shining saints appeared to him in a dream and told him to run with them quickly. The sick man said: How can I run with you when it is nine years now that I have been unable to rise from this bed alone, without mens help? Then the saints said: If you go with us now, you will come to that place where you will receive healing. Then he was very glad, and wanted to go with them; and when he found himself unable to travel with them, they flew through the air and carried him until they came to a solitary field with brightly blooming flowers. And standing in the field was a church made of shining gold and precious stones. And St. Swithun stood before the altar, dressed in shining Eucharistic vestments, as if about to celebrate the Divine Liturgy. Then Swithun said to the sick man: I tell you, brother, from this time forth you must do evil to no man, nor curse any man, nor speak evil of any man, nor be malicious, nor agree with murderers, nor connive at wicked robbers and thieves, nor join in evil deeds, but rather, as best you can, help the needy with your own goods. Then you will be healed by the power of God. Then the sick man reflected that he did not wish to do evil except to those who had done evil to him, and that he wished to do good to those who had done good to him. But St. Swithun knew the reasoning of his heart, and said to him cheerfully: Brother, I tell you, you must not do what you are thinking and harm any man, even if he harms you, but imitate your Lord, Who would not curse those who put Him to death, and commanded His followers to pray for their enemies. In the same way Paul the Apostle says to all Christians: If your enemy hungers, feed him, or if he thirsts, give him to drink. Then the bedridden man said to the bishop: O sir, tell me what kind of man you are, since you are so well able to discern the thoughts of men. Then St. Swithun said: I am he who has just recently come, as if he said: I have just recently been made known. What is your name? asked the man. When you come to Winchester, you will know my name, replied the saint. Then the man was immediately brought back to his bed, and awoke from sleep, and told his wife the whole of the vision he had seen. Then the woman said to him that it was Swithun who had instructed him and whom he had seen looking so glorious in the church. It would be very good if some men carried you to church, she said, and if you prayed to the saint to cure you. Then they immediately carried him from his bed to a church in the Isle of Wight, and he was instantly healed. And he went home whole and on his feet he who had been carried on a bier to the church. After that he went very quickly to Winchester and told the venerable Bishop Ethelwold how he had been healed through St. Swithun. And Landferth the foreigner wrote it down in Latin.
A certain Winchester man became angry with his serf because of some carelessness, and put him in fetters. He sat in the hated bonds for a long time until, with the aid of a staff, he hopped out on one foot and with tears prayed to St. Swithun. The bolt immediately shot out of the fetter and the serf arose, freed by the saint.
We cannot write, concludes Aelfric, nor recount in words, all the miracles the holy Swithun wrought by the power of God in the sight of the people, both on prisoners and on the sick, to manifest to men that they, like Swithun who now shines out through his miracles, may be counted worthy of the Kingdom of heaven by good works. Both walls of the old church were hung, from end to end, with crutches and the stools of cripples who had been healed there. Even so they could not put half of them up.
Another great miracle took place in the middle of the eleventh century, as Canon Frederick Busby recounts. Queen Emma, the mother of King Edward the Confessor, had been accused of unchastity with Bishop Alwyn of Winchester. In order to prove her innocent she was obliged to undergo the ordeal of walking over nine red-hot ploughshares placed on the pavement of the nave of the Cathedral. The Cathedral annalist says: The new was spread throughout the Kingdom that the Queen was to undergo this ordeal; and such was the throng of people who flocked to Winchester, that so vast a concourse on one day was never seen there before. The King himself, Saint Edward, came to Winchester; nor did a single noble of the Kingdom absent himself, except Archbishop Robert, who feigned illness and, being inimical to the Queen, had poisoned the Kings mind against her, so that if her innocence was proved he might be able to make his escape without difficulty. The pavement of the church being swept, there were placed upon it nine red-hot ploughshares, over which a short prayer was said, and then the Queens shoes and stockings were drawn off, and laying aside here mantle and putting off her veil, with her garments girded closely about her, between two bishops, one on either hand, she was conducted to the torture. The bishops who led here wept, and, though they were more terrified than she was, they encouraged her not to be afraid. All persons who were within the church wept and there was a general exclamation: O, St. Swithun, St. Swithun, help her! The people cried with great vehemence that St. Swithun must hasten to the rescue. The Queen prayed: St. Swithun, rescue me from the fire that is prepared for me. Then followed a miracle. Guided by the Bishops she walked over the red-hot ploughshares, she felt neither the naked iron nor the fire.
St. Swithuns feastdays are July 2 and July 15.

Holy Father Swithun, pray to God for us!

Sources:
The Anglo-Saxon Chronicle;
Abbot Aelfric, Lives of the Saints, Early English Texts Society, no. 76, 1881;
Frederick Busby, Saint Swithun, Winchester, 1971;
Swithun and Scandinavia, in Winchester Cathedral: Record 1972;
David Farmer, The Oxford Dictionary of Saints, Oxford: The Clarendon Press, 1978, p. 365.

HIEROMARTYR BISHOP MARK OF SERGIEV POSAD

By Vladimir Moss
Vladimir Moss was born in 1949 in London into the family of a British diplomat, and was educated in the British public school and university system. He has a first degree in Philosophy and Psychology, and a Doctorate in Psychology. He is married to Olga (the grand-daughter of Arseny Abramovich Morozov). He lives in England. He is one of the most important modern Church-Historians and authors, with works on Russian Orthodoxy, Russian Catacomb Church, Russian New Martyrs, Orthodox England, etc.

Bishop Mark, in the world Michael Alexandrovich Novoselov, was born in June, 1864 in the village of Babye, Domoslavskaya volost, Vishnevolochok uyezd, Tver province, into a family which had been linked for generations with the Orthodox country clergy. His mother, Capitolina Mikhailovna, was the daughter of the priest Fr. Michael Vasilyevich Zashigransky. His father, Alexander Grigoryevich (1834-1887), of noble descent, was also the son of the priest, and became a well-known teacher, the director of the Tula, and then of the fourth Moscow classical gymnasium.
Michael Alexandrovich lived with his parents in Tula, and received an excellent education, graduating from his father's school with a gold medal. He was well-built, and was renowned in Tula as a boxer. In 1886 he graduated from the historical-philological faculty of Moscow University. It was at this point that he got to know the famous novelist Lev Tolstoy, who often visited his father when he lived in Tula. Michael Alexandrovich became a close friend and disciple of Lev Tolstoy, and there exists a copious correspondence between them from the period 1886-1901. He was arrested on December 27, 1887, together with some young friends who had been infected with the ideas of the "People's Will" movement, for possessing some literature of this movement as well as Tolstoy's brochure "Nicholas Palkin", and might well have been sent to Siberia if it had not been for the intervention of Tolstoy himself. In February, 1888, Michael Alexandrovich was released but forbidden to live in the capitals.
Abandoning any thought of a career in teaching, Michael Alexandrovich bought some land in the village of Dugino, Tver province, and created one of the first Tolstoyan land communes in Russia. It existed for two years. However, the peasants' refusal to accept the commune, and their patient endurance of their hard life, gradually led Michael Alexandrovich to question his own beliefs and pay more attention to the world-view of the peasants - Orthodoxy. Moreover, on one point he could never agree with Tolstoy - his rejection of the Divinity of the Lord Jesus Christ, and of the element of mystery in human life. Finally, after responding to his appeal to help the starving in Ryazan province (at the end of 1891 to 1892), he broke with Tolstoy, and spoke against his teachings for the rest of his life, while acknowledging the very significant influence he had had on him. Tolstoy’s last letter, written in Optina desert, was addressed to M.A. Novoselov. Michael Alexandrovich did not succeed in replying to it, but much later said that if he had been able, he probably would not have replied.
After the break with Tolstoy, he became very close to St. John of Kronstadt, and then to the elders of Optina and Zosima deserts. His spiritual father was Igumen Herman of Zosima desert. Under their influence, he gradually acquired a firm, strictly Orthodox world-view, based exclusively on the teachings of the Holy Fathers. Michael Alexandrovich was a brilliant professor of classical philology at Moscow University. He was widely known in Russia as the publisher and editor of the so-called "Moral-Religious Library", the first volume of which, entitled "The Forgotten Path", was published in 1902 in Vyshny Volochok, where Michael Alexandrovich was living at the time. His publishing activity continued right up to the revolution - first in Vyshny Volochok, and then in Moscow and Sergiev Posad.
The philosopher Nicholas Berdyaev described Michael Alexandrovich as "a very strong believer, completely devoted to his idea, very active, even restless, very sympathetic to people, always ready to help, especially in a spiritual way. He wanted to convert everybody. He produced the impression of a secretly tonsured monk."
Michael Alexandrovich taught Greek in the fourth Moscow gymnasium until 1916, and was professor in the faculty of classical philology in Moscow University. His merits in the field of spiritual education and Christian apologetics were so great that in 1912 he was elected an honorary member of the Moscow Theological Academy. For several years he was a member of the Educational Council attached to the Holy Synod. In 1918, during the Local Council of the Russian Church in Moscow, he was invited to take part in the work of the section on theological educational institutions, which was to seek out new ways of developing theological education in the country.
From 1905 Michael Alexandrovich was at the centre of the movement for Church reform, the convening of a Church Council and the restoration of the parish community. However, he was against convening a Council hastily, without proper preparation and the canvassing of the opinions of both clergy and laity. And he was therefore in favour of a Pre-Conciliar Preparatory Convention, which in fact took place in 1906.
In 1907, he founded a religious society called the “Circle of those seeking Christian Enlightenment”, which met in Moscow and numbered about 200 people. They included Fr. Paul Florensky, Fr. Joseph Fudel, Sergius Nikolayevich Bulgakov, Vladimir Alexeyevich Kozhevnikov, Paul Demetrievich Mansurov, Theodore Dmitrievich Samarin, Sergius Nikolayevich Durylin, Vladimir Frantsevich Ern, Theodore Konstantinovich Andreyev, and others. This was not his first foray into this kind of activity. He had attended the meetings of the Petersburg "Religio-Philosophical Meetings" (1901-1903), at which he always expressed a strictly Orthodox position in opposition to Merezhkovsky and Rozanov. And he had also participated in the work of the Moscow religio-philosophical society dedicated to the memory of his friend Vladimir Soloviev (1905-1918). According to Constantine Sergeyevich Rodionov, "all the members of his society regularly went to church. They prayed in the church, and then read lectures in the society and discussed them. This was a purely Orthodox society, and M.A. Novoselov was the ideological leader of Orthodoxy in Moscow. The meetings of the members of the society took place in his flat. He lived with his mother opposite the cathedral of Christ the Saviour."
The society enjoyed the protection of the rector of the Moscow Theological Academy and future hieromartyr of the Catacomb Church, Bishop Theodore (Pozdeyevsky), and was spiritually led by the elders of the Zosima Hermitage.
According to Rozanov, "the essence of the bond of this circle is personal and moral. Its highest quality is considered not to put oneself forward, not to quarrel, and to publish as little as possible. But instead of that - to see each other more often, to mix, to live a certain common, or almost common life. Without any conditions or qualifications they call the one who is almost the oldest among them, Michael Alexandrovich Novoselov, 'Abba Michael'. And although some of them are immeasurably more learned and in general 'intellectual' than the honoured and dear M.A. Novoselov, nevertheless they revere him 'as a father' for his clear, kind character, for the purity of his soul and intentions, and not only listen to him, but almost obey him."
Michael Alexandrovich became one of the firmest and most clear-thinking Orthodox thinkers who were struggling with the poison of modernism. In this respect he undoubtedly betrayed the influence of his spiritual instructor, Vladyka Theodore. He was a conservative and a monarchist, but at the same time was prepared to fight the Church hierarchy when necessary.
Thus when, at the end of 1911, the affair of Bishop Hermogenes and Heliodorus became well known, and rumours spread about the possibility of Rasputin being ordained, Michael Alexandrovich, with the help of Grand Duchess Elizabeth, published a brochure exposing Rasputin, in which he said: "Why do the bishops, who are well acquainted with the activities of this blatant deceiver and corrupter, keep silent?... Where is their grace, if through laziness or lack of courage they do not keep watch over the purity of the faith of the Church of God and allow the lascivious khlyst [sectarian] to do the works of darkness under the mask of light?" Of course, the brochure was forbidden and confiscated while it was still at the printer's, and the newspaper The Voice of Moscow was heavily fined for publishing excerpts from it.
In 1912 there arose the movement of the “name-worshippers” among the Russian monks of Mount Athos. These monks were condemned as heretics by the Holy Synods of the Constantinopolitan and Russian Churches. However, Michael Alexandrovich defended them. For this reason he is sometimes considered to have been a “name-worshipper” himself. But a closer examination of his views reveals that he never agreed with some of the cardinal positions of the leading name-worshipper, Fr. Anthony Bulatovich.
Thus Bulatovich considered that all thought about God is the uncreated action of God and God Himself, writing: “Human thought is not the product of the human mind to the extent that that which the human eye sees is not a product of his vision… Forcing the mind to think about God is a human action, but any true thought about God is already a vision of God in some God-revealed property of His and is God Himself.” Michael Alexandrovich, however, rejected this idea, writing: “The thought and my object are not one and the same… The thought of a man about God remains a human thought… The power of God, penetrating the mind, elicit in him a thought about God, which is nevertheless a human thought, a condition of my mind.”
With the coming of the Bolsheviks, Michael Alexandrovich did not slacken his work for the Church. Thus from January 30, 1918 he was a member of the Temporary Council of the United Parishes of the city of Moscow, and in February, 1918 his name was on the appeal released by this Council which called on believers to defend the churches from the encroachments of the God-fighting power. Again, he offered his flat for the theological courses which began in the spring of 1918 with the blessing of Patriarch Tikhon, and himself taught patristics.
According to the oral tradition of the Catacomb Church, Michael Alexandrovich was tonsured as a monk in 1920, and in 1923 was made a secret bishop with the name of Mark and the title of Sergiev Posad, by Bishops Theodore (Pozdeyevsky) of Volokolamsk, Arsenius (Zhadanovsky) of Serphukov and Seraphim (Zvezdinsky) of Dmitrov. Although there are no documents proving the episcopate of Michael Alexandrovich, the following facts serve to confirm it: (1) on the protocol of his interrogation in connection with the case of the “All-Union Centre ‘True Orthodoxy’”, the words “Bishop Mark” are written in the hand of the interrogator; (2) in the interrogation of Natalya Andreyevna, the matushka of Hieromartyr Theodore Andreyev, mention is made of the episcopate of M.A. Novoselov.
When the schism of the "Living Church" broke out in 1922, Michael Alexandrovich was very probably a member of the "Brotherhood of Zealots of Orthodoxy" which published a "Brotherly Warning to the Children of the True Church of Christ" in which the following points were made: "...5. Therefore the 'guardian of piety' (speaking in the language of the Epistle of the Eastern Patriarchs), the Orthodox people, must decisively reject the usurpers of Church authority, not entering into communion with them and not allowing the prayerful commemoration of their names in the churches. 6. Those Orthodox priests and laymen who will continue to support ecclesiastical communion with the self-made schismatic hierarchy are thereby expelled with it from the body of the Church, that is, they have separated themselves from Christ."
This activity could not fail to attract the attention of the authorities, and on August 12, 1922, Heinrich Yagoda, the deputy president of the GPU, signed an order for the searching of Michael Alexandrovich's flat. He had gone to Optina at that time and so was not present at the search, which discovered nothing significantly incriminating. But it meant that from this time – although the case against him was dropped on March 19, 1923 - he could not return to his flat and was forced to live in an illegal situation, hiding in the houses of his many friends, mainly in Moscow and Petersburg. Thus he sometimes lives in the flat of Claudia Vladimirovna Nazarova, and in that of Valeria Liorko Prishvina and her mother. He also lived in Vyshny Volochok.
Thus Constantine Sergeyevich Rodionov writes: "When the Bolshevik persecutions against the faith began, Michael Alexandrovich Novoselov hid for a whole year. One night he would spend in my house, another - in the house of some woman whom I didn't ask about. I was unexpectedly sent on an expedition to the Caucasus as a bee-keeper. In my absence M.A. Novoselov and A.F. Losev walked down Nikitsky boulevard in the Arbat. Some people came up to them at the church of Saints Boris and Gleb and arrested them. Losev was soon released, but not Michael Alexandrovich. He was carrying my bread ration cards with my address on them. But my house was not searched. He was sent to Suzdal prison. From there Michael Alexandrovich let me know that we should be calm - he had not betrayed anyone. It seems that as a religious activist he was sentenced under article 58-10."
Once Bishop Mark said: “Now is a time when the righteousness of a person before God is defined not so much by his personal behaviour, his sins or virtue, as by his firmness in the faith, in his faithfulness to Church consciousness, his determination to stand in this faithfulness until death and martyrdom.”
From 1922 until the end of 1927, Bishop Mark wrote a series of twenty "letters to friends" which constitute one of the most important contributions to ecclesiology in twentieth-century theology.
Thus in 1925 he wrote: "I shall say a few words to reveal the positive path of Christ, which was, undoubtedly, forgotten by the Church SRs [the predecessors of the renovationists] and has now been openly rejected by the Church Bolsheviks [the renovationists].
"First of all, both relate to the Church as to a human institution, which is why the term 'revival of the Church' occupies the first place in their vocabulary. They suppose - this is clear from their writings and actions - that only human energy is needed, on the one hand, and a series of external changes in Church organization, on the other, in order that the 'paralyzed' body of the Church should revive and begin to function correctly. The source of Church revival is in the church activists themselves. What is required is a skilful choice of energetic activists so as to revive, give wings to and set into motion the dead organization called 'the Church'. I repeat: this point of view is common both to the renovationists and to the majority of what we shall call the Old Churchmen. Neither group suspects what a jungle of religious errors they have wandered into, where they themselves are going, and where they are leading other unreflective people away from the true, genuine preaching of Christ.
"So as to speak with sense about the revival of the parish or of Church society in general (but by no means of the Church, which is herself the source of ever-flowing life), it is necessary first to give oneself a clear answer to the question: 'What is life in the Christian meaning of the word?'
"Genuine life is eternal life, and it is in the Lord Jesus Christ, or the Lord Himself, the Son of God, Who is called Eternal Life in the holy Gospel. Hence Church revival is revival in the Lord Jesus Christ, it is a more or less deep immersion in eternal life - Christ the Son of God, or the reception of It inside oneself. In this acquisition of eternal life, or, speaking in the words of the holy Apostle Peter, in this 'partaking of the Divine nature', or in the deification of man, lies the main aim of the Christian life." (Letter 1)
One of Vladyka Mark's most important contributions to theological thought was the distinction he worked out between the Church as organism and the Church as organization: "It is necessary to distinguish between the Church-organism and the Church-organization. As the apostle taught: 'You are the Body of Christ and individually members of it' (I Corinthians 12.27). The Church-organism is a living person, and just as the cells of our body, besides having their own life, have the life that is common to our body and links between themselves, so a man in the Body of Christ begins to live in Church, while Christ begins to live in him. That is why the apostle said: 'It is no longer I who live, but Christ lives in me' (Galatians 2.20).
"The basis for the affirmation of the Church-organism is love for Christ. The Lord Himself saw the basis of His Church precisely in love for Him. He asked Peter: did he love Him? And He added: 'Feed My sheep'. The Church of Christ is the union of mutual love of the believers ('United by the bond of love and offering themselves to Christ the Lord, the apostles were washed clean', Canon of Holy Thursday). Only in the Church organism can true democratism, equality and brotherhood come into being; we are equal and brothers only if we are parts of one and the same living body. In the organization there is not and cannot be ‘organic’ equality and brotherhood" (Letter 5).
"Only to the Church-organism can we apply such titles as we meet in the Word of God, for example: 'glorious, holy, spotless' (Ephesians 1.4); 'the Bride of the Lamb' (Revelation 19.7; 21.9); 'the Body of Christ' (Ephesians 1.23; Colossians 1.24); 'the pillar and ground of the truth' (I Timothy 3.15). These concepts are inapplicable to the Church-organization (or applicable only with great qualifications); they lead people into perplexity and are rejected by them. The Church-organism is the pure 'Bride' of Christ (Revelation 21.2), but the Church-organization has all the faults of human society and always bears the marks of human infirmities... The Church-organization often persecutes the saints of God, but the Church-organism receives them into her bosom... The Church-organization rejects them from its midst, deprives them of episcopal sees, while they remain the most glorious members of the Church-organism. It is possible to belong externally to the visible Church (organization), while one belongs only inwardly to the Body of Christ (organism), and the measure of one's belongingness is determined by the degree of one's sanctity." (Letter 18)
Vladyka Mark also made an important contribution to the concept of the conciliarity [sobornost'] of the Church: "It is not the Council that is important, but conciliarity (the infallible teaching magisterium), which reveals itself by all means, whether at a Council or not. From the fact that the Church in definite historical periods convenes Councils, or that she does not convene them, one must by no means conclude that the infallible magisterium existed in such-and-such a period, but not in such-and-such a period. This simply means that in such-and-such a period circumstances demanded that the magisterium reveal itself in such a form, whereas in the other period circumstances did not demand precisely this form of revelation. As a result of this neither conciliarity nor the magisterium is in any way affected in its grace-filled and uninterrupted existence... Conciliarity in the Church of Christ is revealed in the agreement of all her members amongst themselves. This agreement is not assigned to any particular local Church, to any particular geographical point, or to any particular hierarch or meeting of hierarchs, but binds together all those who belong to the Church. Neither does it need any juridical regulations since its self-existent power acts beyond rules that our attainable by our reason. It simply exists, and itself defines all the remaining manifestations of Church life instead of being defined by them. One of these manifestations is the Ecumenical Councils...
"The material element in the magisterium (of such Councils) consists in the people who take part in the Council, in the external conditions of their working together and in the quantity and character of the matters they resolve. But the spiritual element lies in the identity of the conciliar witnesses with the faith of the whole body of the Church. It is this very identity which is nothing other than conciliarity itself, as expressed in the Council. And it alone defines in itself the ecumenicity and conciliar magisterium which are wholly included in it (that is, in the above-mentioned identity). For conciliarity, ecumenicity, magisterium - all these are terms with different meanings that define in themselves only various forms of one and the same whole, whose name is the Holy Spirit Who rules the Church...
"The conciliarity of each Council is established only from the following material historical phenomenon: its de facto acceptance, and the acceptance of the witnesses it gives, by the whole body of the Church as being its own witnesses. Thus this question is resolved on the basis of fact, and not on the basis of right. And so: if the whole body of the Church de facto accepts the Council, that means that the Council was Ecumenical. But if the Church rejects it, that means that for the Church it was nothing.
"The Council in and of itself has no significance. The only thing that is important is conciliarity, which depends, not on any particular meeting of people, nor, a fortiori, on any particular person, but on the whole Church. All this is historically proven. The ecumenical significance of a particular Council was by no means recognized immediately, but only after a certain time had passed, time that was necessary for the elucidation of this question.
"Of course, the Church herself and all her living members, to the degree of their participation in her, have no need whatever of a rational criterion of the ecumenicity of her own Councils. But in addressing errors, and in the sense of a rational support for those who need that, the Church in Council rationally justifies her witnesses, holding to popular criteria. And for that reason she also refers to such facts as are understood by the reason of all, even outsiders.
"The conclusion is as follows: the faith of the Church opposes this or that heresy not because this or that heresy was condemned by this or that Ecumenical Council, but rather the reverse: such-and-such an Ecumenical Council condemned such-and-such a heresy because it opposed the faith of the Church. This position cuts off the way for all further polemics because all further polemics are rendered pointless.
"And so, as regards conciliar infallibility, this lies, as we have seen, in the identity of the witnesses given by the Council with the faith of the whole Church body. The character of this conciliar infallibility, that is, of this infallible conciliar agreement, is by no means affected by the variety of those material means by which it is certified. Of course, the most expedient means of certification for outsiders is a material congress of a known number of physical people, which is called a Council. But conciliar agreement can also inspire any other witness, which is therefore a conciliar witness because of this identity with the opinion of the whole Church body. For conciliarity is one, unchanging spirit, whereas witnesses are subject to the law of material variety of external forms. From this it follows that ecumenicity, infallibility and conciliarity are everywhere, in every true witness that is identical with the faith of the Church, being given according to the participation in the Holy Church of whoever it may be: a Council, great or small, or an individual person, be he a fool-for-Christ or a child.
"And from this there follows the church thesis of the complete, absolute estrangement of the conciliar principle from any formal-juridical rules of its government. The Spirit witnesses of Himself in the Church of Christ when He wants, where He wants and how He wants, because it is not we who are measured for the Spirit, but the Spirit is measured for us.
"This is the Orthodox answer to the question: who in each case is the infallible organ of the Holy Spirit in the Church. The Spirit Himself chooses in each case. For it is not the organ which, by its own right, gives itself the Spirit, but the Spirit, by His mercy, gives Himself to the organ. This precludes, once and for all, all juridical means of defining conciliarity, which is accessible only to faith and love, and not to the reason.
"This is the unshakeable Orthodox teaching of the Ecumenical Apostolic Church." (Letter 11)
Like his mentor, Vladyka Theodore, Bishop Mark criticized Patriarch Tikhon's compromises with the communists and renovationists, but did not break communion with him. When Metropolitan Sergius issued his notorious "declaration" in 1927, he took an ardent part in the protest against the metropolitan, giving advice to many bishops and priests who venerated him, and is considered by many to have been the leader of the Catacomb Church in Moscow. In his last letter to friends, written at the end of 1927, he said, obviously referring to the situation created by Sergius' declaration: "The whole ship of the Church has listed and is hanging over the edge of the abyss."
From November, 1927, Vladyka Mark was living in Leningrad and took part in the councils of the leading Josephite clergy. It was at this time that he wrote his “Apology for those who have departed from M. Sergius (Stragorodsky)”, one of the longest and most comprehensive of all exposés of sergianism. At some point in 1927 Bishop Mark was arrested, but soon released.
At the beginning of 1928 he wrote “A Conversation of Two Friends” with the help of Hieromartyr Theodore Andreyev. Here he compared Sergianism to an illness as follows: “The microbe of the illness of the higher Church authorities in the person of Metropolitan Sergius is the compromising thought that was born in the mind of Metropolitan Sergius during his isolation, after which he was freed [in March, 1927].
“The treatment of this sign of illness was the friendly advice of the most authoritative people not to take a step that would be harmful for the Church, and as a consequence of the ineffectiveness of this treatment, that is, the non-acceptance of the good advice, a red spot appeared. The external redness on the body of the sick person was the Synod composed of hierarchs with tarnished reputations and with the rights of a consultative organ, according to the declaration of Metropolitan Sergius dated May 5/18, 1927.
“An increase in the redness was the assumption by the Synod of the rights and authority to rule together with Metropolitan Sergius and the Synod’s transfer of bishops.
“A malignant growth was the appearance of the declaration of July 16/29, 1927. Various methods of treating the illness were employed: the condemnation of the declaration by the conscience of believers and the distribution of leaflets by the zealots of Orthodoxy reproaching the actions of Metropolitan Sergius and his Synod and explaining the correct relationship of the Church to the state in contemporary conditions.
“The formation of an abscess was the order of October 8/21, 1927 concerning the commemoration of Metropolitan Sergius and the civil authorities.
“A surgical cutting of the abscess with the aim of warding off further infection was the partial separation from Metropolitan Sergius and his Synod of whole dioceses and individual parishes.
“If there is no healing after this operation, then it will be necessary, with pain of heart, to make an amputation of the sick member, that is, for all zealots of the purity of Orthodoxy to separate finally from Metropolitan Sergius. God grant that this may not happen!…”
But it did happen, and Bishop Mark was among those who separated finally from Metropolitan Sergius.
In March, 1928 he wrote “Why we have Departed from Metropolitan Sergius”. And another of his brochures, which is mentioned in many trials of the True Orthodox Christians, was “What must a Orthodox Christian Know?” In this brochure he wrote: “Every Christian must look at the civil authority contemporary with us as allowed by God to punish us and bring us to our senses”; “Christianity and Communism mutually exclude each other, and the struggle between them is inevitable”; “there has been introduced civil marriage, which radically destroys the idea of the family that has been established by God Himself, and an animal life is the result”; “patriotism has been replaced by internationalism and class warfare”; “the civil authorities are demanding that the Orthodox Church justify their actions against Christianity, that is, recognize the revolution, which is violence and can never be justified by the Church”; “the reason for the persecutions against the Church on the part of the unbelieving authorities consists in the striving to submit the Church to their influence and through the Church prepare the people to accept the Antichrist as the political and spiritual head of fallen humanity”.
In regard to Soviet power, Bishop Mark expressed the following opinion: “I am an enemy of Soviet power - and what is more, by dint of my religious convictions, insofar as Soviet power is an atheist power and even anti-theist. I believe that as a true Christian I cannot strengthen this power by any means... [There is] a petition which the Church has commanded to be used everyday in certain well-known conditions... The purpose of this formula is to request the overthrow of the infidel power by God... But this formula does not amount to a summons to believers to take active measures, but only calls them to pray for the overthrow of the power that has fallen away from God.”
Once Bishop Mark visited Metropolitan Joseph, who said: “Novoselov spoke with me about the situation in the Church that has been created by Sergius’ declaration. He said that the position of the declaration was unacceptable for the believing people and, in particular, for certain ‘church zealots from the intelligentsia’. However, he did not name any representatives of this kind of intelligentsia…” According to Metropolitan Joseph, Bishop Mark had some influence on Metropolitan Agathangelus and Archbishop Seraphim of Uglich.
On March 23 (or 17), 1929 he was arrested again by the OGPU in Moscow, and on May 17 (or 23) was sentenced as an especially dangerous “element” to three years in political isolators according to article 58-10 of the criminal code. First, from May 23, 1929, he was in the Suzdal political isolator. Then, on October 27, 1930, he was transferred to the Butyrki prison in Moscow. On September 3, 1931, he was condemned in accordance with article 58-10 as “an active participant in the church-political centre of the All-Union counter-revolutionary organization, ‘The True Orthodox Church’”. He was sentenced to eight years in Yaroslavl political isolator. This was part of the group case, “The Case of the All-Union Centre of True Orthodoxy, 1931”.
In the sentence of 1931 it was decreed that “in relation to M.A. Novoselov the resolution of the Special Conference of May 17, 1929 is to be considered swallowed up by the present resolution”. The indictment read: “In the course of several years he has been a participant in ‘The Church-Political Centre’ of the All-Union counter-revolutionary organization, ‘The True Orthodox Church’, and was in an illegal position. On the instructions of this centre, he, together with reactionary churchmen in Leningrad, created the ‘All-Union Church-Administrative Centre’ of this organization, and ruled the latter on instructions from the centre in a counter-revolutionary direction, demanding active counter-revolutionary activity from the organization. Going round the periphery in a systematic manner, he created a series of branches of this organization – in Tver, in Serpukhov and in a series of other places, and directed their counter-revolutionary activity. He wrote counter-revolutionary documents and was in charge of their distribution.”
On February 7, 1937 he was sentenced to another three years in Vologda prison for counter-revolutionary activity. He arrived there on June 26, 1937. On January 17, 1938 he was sentenced to death “for carrying out… anti-Soviet agitation in prison” and was shot.
V.D. Prishvina writes: “The old women who used to send M.A. Novoselov parcels in prison lost trace of him during the Fatherland war: parcels began to come back without explanation. Only once did they receive a living witness about him: an unknown Turk came to the old women on being released from prison and sent to his homeland. He carried out a promise he had given to Novoselov – to give them his blessing and thanks. The Turk met Michael Alexandrovich in the prison hospital, where he converted him to Christianity. He spoke about Michael Alexandrovich as about a saint.

Sources:
M.A. Novoselov, Pis'ma k druzyam, Moscow: St. Tikhon's Theological Institute, 1994;
Protopresbyter Michael Polsky, Noviye Mucheniki Rossijskiye, Jordanville, 1949-1957, part 2, pp. 135-136, 272;
Monk Ambrose (von Sievers), "Nye khoronitye menya zazhivo", Russkaya Mysl', N 4031, 1 June, 1994;
"Terpeniye" (MS); Nun Joanna (Pomazanskaya) "Ispovyednicheskij Put' Vladyki Fyodora", Pravoslavnaya Zhizn', N 9 (549), September, 1995, pp. 1-29;
Lev Regelson, Tragediya Russkoj Tserkvi, 1917-1945, Paris: YMCA Press, 1977;
N. Zernov, Russkoye Religioznoye Vozrozhdeniye;
M.V. Shkarovsky, "Iz novejshej istoriii Russkoj Tserkvi", Pravoslavnaya Rus', N 18 (1543), September 15/28, 1995, pp. 8-10;
Iosiflyanstvo, St. Petersburg: Memorial, 1999, pp. 291-292;
"Vospominaniya Konstantina Sergeyevicha Rodionova (1892-1991)", Vestnik Russkogo Khristianoskogo Dvizheniya, 164, I-1992, pp. 279-281;
"Primyety Vremyeni", Pravoslavnaya Zhizn', N 5 (545), May, 1995, pp.23-24;
Pravoslavnaya Rus’, N 14 (1587), July 15/28, 1997, p. 3;
Bishop Ambrose (von Sievers), “Katakombnaya Tserkov’: ‘Kochuyushchij Sobor 1928 g.”, Russkoye Pravoslaviye, N 3 (7), 1997;
“Episkopat Istinno-Pravoslavnoj Katakombnoj Tserkvi 1922-1997gg.”, Russkoye Pravoslaviye, N 4(8), 1997, p. 11;
“Endurance: Reminiscences of the True Orthodox Church”, Religion, State & Society, vol. 25, N 3, 1997, p. 221;
I.I. Osipova, “Skvoz’ Ogn’ Muchenij i Vody Slyoz”, Moscow: Serebryanniye Niti, 1998, p. 269;
“Istoria Istinno Pravoslavnoj Tserkvi po Materialam Sledstvennago Dela”, Pravoslavnaya Rus’, N 14 (1587), July 15/28, 1997, p. 3;
“Beseda dvukh druzej”, Pravoslavnaya Zhizn’, 49, N 6 (594), June, 1999, pp. 1-33;
Priest Paul Florensky, Perepiska s M.A. Novoselovym, Tomsk, 1998, pp. 101, 190;
M.S. Sakharov and L.E. Sikorskaya, Svyaschennomuchenik Iosif Mitropolit Petrogradskij, St. Petersburg, 2006, p. 121;
L.E. Sikorskaya, Svyaschennomuchenik Dimitrij, Arkhiepiskop Gdovskij, Moscow, 2008, pp. 284-;
Za Khrista Postradavshiye, Moscow, 1997, vol. 1, p. 411;
http://www.pstbi.ru/bin/code.exe/frames/m/ind_oem.html?/ans)
ΡΩΣΙΚΕΣ ΕΙΚΟΝΕΣ ΤΗΣ ΘΕΟΤΟΚΟΥ
Καθηγητοῦ Ἀντ. Μάρκου

Ἀρχική δημοσίευση στό Περιοδικό «Ὀρθόδοξη Μαρτυρία» Λευκωσίας (φ. 56/1998, σελ. 84 – 93). Στή συνέχεια δημοσιεύεται μέρος τοῦ ἀρχικοῦ κειμένου.

Ἡ Παναγία τοῦ ἁγ. Ἀνδρέα τῆς Θείας Ἀγάπης
Ἡ θαυματουργή αὐτή εἰκόνα τῆς Παναγίας συνδέεται μέ τό πρόσωπο τοῦ ἁγ. Ἀνδρέα τῆς Θείας Ἀγάπης (ρωσιστί Μπογκολιούμπσκυ) καί τίς ἀπαρχές τῆς Ρωσικῆς Χριστιανικῆς Ἱστορίας.
Ὁ ἅγ. Ἀνδρέας ἦταν γιός τοῦ Μεγάλου Ἡγεμόνα τοῦ Κιέβου Γεωργίου τοῦ Μακρόχειρα (ρωσιστί Ντολγκορούκι) καί ἔτυχε ἱκανῆς παιδείας. Ἀρχικά ἀνέλαβε τήν Ἡγεμονία τοῦ Βλαδιμήρ, ὅπου ἐπέδειξε μεγάλες διοικητικές ἱκανότητες. Ὅταν πατέρας του ἔγινε Μεγάλος Ἡγεμόνας, ὁ Ἀνδρέας μετακινήθηκε στό Βύσγκοροντ, ἀπ' ὅπου πῆρε τήν μετέπειτα ἐφέστια Εἰκόνα τῆς Ρωσίας, τήν ἐπονομαζομένη "Παναγία τοῦ Βλαδιμή-ρου" (πρόκειται γιά ἀρχαῖα εἰκόνα τῆς Παναγίας πού ἀποδίδεται στόν Εὐαγγελιστή Λουκᾶ, ἡ ὁποῖο δωρήθηκε στόν Γεώργιο Ντολγκοροῦκι ἀπό τόν Πατριάρχη ΚΠόλεως Λουκᾶ Χρυσοβέργη). Κατά τήν παράδοση ἔξω ἀπό τήν πόλη τοῦ ἐμφανίσθηκε ἡ Ὑπεραγία Θεοτόκος καί τοῦ ζήτησε νά ἱδρύση μονή στό σημεῖο ἐκεῖνο. Ὁ Ἀνδρέας πράγματι ἵδρυσε μονή καί ἔπειτα πόλη καί ζήτησε νά ἁγιογραφήσουν τήν ἐμφάνιση τῆς Θεομήτορος στήν ἀναξιότητά του. Ὅλα (ἡ Μονή, ἡ πόλη, ἡ εἰκόνα, ἀλλά καί ὁ ἴδιος), ὀνομάσθηκαν "τῆς Θείας Ἀγάπης" (ρωσιστί Μπογκολιούμποβο).
Τό 1157, μετά τόν θάνατο τοῦ πατέρα του, ἀναδείχθηκε Μεγάλος Ἡγεμόνας καί μετέφερε τήν ἕδρα τῆς Κιεβινῆς Ρωσίας ἀπό τό Κίεβο στό Βλαδιμήρ, ὅπου ὕψωσε λαμπρούς ναούς (περίπου 30· ὁ πλέον γνωστός εἶναι ὁ Ναός τῆς Κοιμήσεως τῆς Θεοτόκου, ὅπου κατατέθηκε - τό 1164 - ἡ Παναγία τοῦ Βλαδιμήρου). Τό 1164 ἔκτισε τίς λεγόμενες Χρυσές Πύλες τοῦ Κιέβου.
Δολοφονήθηκε στό Μπογκολιούμποβο τό 1175 ἀπό συνωμότες Βογιάρους, ἄν καί ἦταν ἄριστος κυβερνήτης καί ἱεραπόστολος τοῦ Εὐαγγελίου στόν ἐντόπιο πληθυσμό. Ἐνταφιάσθηκε στό Ναό τῆς Κοιμήσεως τῆς Θεοτόκου στό Βλαδιμήρ, ὅπου διαφυλάχθηκε τό ἀδιάφθορο Λείψανό του. Ἡ μνήμη του τιμᾶται τήν 29η Ἰουνίου.
Μετά τήν Ἐπανάσταση τοῦ 1917, τόσο τό Λείψανο τοῦ ἁγ. Ἀνδρέα, ὅσο καί ἡ Θεομητορική Εἰκόνα πού φέρει τό ὄνομά του, ἐκτέθηκαν στό τοπικό Μουσεῖο Σούζνταλ – Βλαδιμήρ. Τό 1987, κατά τήν περίοδο τῆς Περεστρόϊκα, τό Λείψανο ἐπιστράφηκε στή Ρωσική Ἐκκλησία καί σήμερα φυλάσσεται στόν Καθεδρικό Ναό Κοιμ. Θεοτόκου Βλαδιμήρ.
Ἀπό τά πλέον γνωστά ἀντίγραφα τῆς Παναγίας τοῦ ἁγ. Ἀνδρέα εἶναι ἐκεῖνα τῆς Μόσχας καί τοῦ Ζιτομίρ. Τιμᾶται τήν 18η Ἰουνίου, ἡμέρα μνήμης τοῦ ἁγ. Ἀνδρέα.

Ἡ Παναγία τοῦ Κούρσκ
Ἡ Παναγία τοῦ Κούρσκ ἀνῆκει στόν εἰκονογραφικό τύπο τοῦ Σημείου, τοῦ ὁποίου κατά τήν παράδοση τό πρωτότυπο βρέθηκε στή Ρώμη, στήν Κατακόμβη τῆς ἁγ. Ἄννας (πρόκειται γιά τόν εἰκονογραφικό τύπο τῆς Βυζαντινῆς Πλατυτέρας). Εἶναι ἀντίγραφο παλαιό-τερης εἰκόνας πού βρέθηκε στό Νόβγκοροντ τό 1170, τήν ἐπονομαζομένη «τῆς Ρίζης», ἐπειδή βρέθηκε στή ρίζα ἑνός δένδρου ἀπό ἕναν κυνηγό. Στό σημεῖο τῆς εὑρέσεως ὑψώθηκε ἀμέσως ξύλινος ναός τόν ὁποῖο κατέστρεψαν οἱ Τάταροι τό 1382, ἀφοῦ προηγουμένως τεμάχισαν τήν εἰκόνα στά δύο καί βασάνισαν τόν ἐφημέριο.
Στά πρῶτα θαύματα τῆς Παναγίας τοῦ Κούρσκ ἀνήκει ἡ θαυμαστή ἕνωση τῶν δύο τμημάτων, ἐνῶ εὑρύτατα γνωστή εἶναι ἡ θεραπεία τοῦ ἁγ. Σεραφείμ τοῦ Σάρωφ (τόν 18ο αἰ.), ὅταν ἀρρώστησε βαριά κατά τήν παιδική του ἡλικία. Τό 1597 ἱδρύθηκε στό σημεῖο τῆς εὑρέσεως τό περίφημο ἐρημητήριο τοῦ Κούρσκ Ρούτ (τό γνωστό Κορέναγια Πουστίν).
Ἡ Παναγία τοῦ Κούρσκ ὀνομάζεται «Ἡ Ὁδηγήτρια τῆς Ρωσικῆς Διασπορᾶς» (στή φωτό τό πρωτότυπο). Μετά τήν Ἐπανάσταση τοῦ 1917 ἀκολούθησε τήν πορεία τῆς ἐξόριστης Ρωσικῆς Συνόδου στό Κάρλοβιτς τῆς Σερβίας ἀρχικά, στή συνέχεια στό Μόναχο (Μονή ἁγ. Ἰώβ τοῦ Ποτσάεφ) καί τελικά στή Νέα Ὑόρκη (πρῶτα στή Μονή Νέα Κορέναγια καί ἐπειτα στόν Συνοδικό Καθεδρικό Ναό, ὅπου καί σήμερα φυλάσσεται).
Τιμᾶται τήν 3η Μαρτίου, τήν 8η Σεπτεμβρίου καί τήν 27η Νοεμβρίου.

Ἡ Παναγία τοῦ Ντόν
Παλαιότατη εἰκόνα, ἕνα τῶν μεγαλυτέρων κειμηλίων τῆς Ρωσικῆς ἐθνικῆς καί ἐκκλησιαστικῆς Ἱστορίας, ἀφοῦ συνδέ-εται μέ τό Ρωσικό Πουατιέ, τήν Μάχη τοῦ Κουλίκοβο Πόλ, καί τόν ἐθνικό ἥρωα τῆς Ρωσίας καί Ἅγιο τῆς Ρωσικῆς Ὀρθοδοξίας ἅγ. Δημήτριο Ντόνσκοϊ.
Ὁ ἅγ. Δημήτριος (Μεγ. Ἡγεμόνας 1359 – 1389), γεννήθηκε τήν 12. 10. 1350 καί ἦταν γιός τοῦ Μεγ. Ἡγεμόνα Ἰωάννη Β’ τοῦ Ἀγαθοῦ (1353 – 1359) καί τῆς Ἀλεξάνδρας Ἰβάνοβνας Δημήτριεβνας. Ἀνατράφηκε κάτω ἀπό τήν γόνιμη ἐπιρροή τοῦ Μητροπ. Ρωσίας ἁγ. Ἀλεξίου καί ὅταν ἀνέλαβε τήν διακυβέρνηση σέ ἡλικία 9 ἐτῶν, βρέθηκε κάτω ἀπό τήν προστασία τοῦ ἁγίου αὐτοῦ ἀνδρός καί ἐξαιρετικοῦ κυβερνήτη. Ὁ πολιτικός στόχος τοῦ ἁγ. Ἀλεξίου, τόν ὁποῖο ἐμφύτευσε στόν νεαρό Δημήτριο, ἦταν ἡ ἕνωση ὅλων τῶν Ρωσικῶν ἐδαφῶν - Ἡγεμονιῶν κάτω ἀπό τήν Ἡγεμονία τῆς Μόσχας καί ἡ δημιουργία ἑνός ἰσχυροῦ συγκεντρωτικοῦ κράτους, ἱκανοῦ νά ἀπαλλάξει τήν χώρα ἀπό τόν Ταταρικό ζυγό.
Τό 1360 ὁ Τάταρος Χάν ἀπένειμε τόν τίτλο τοῦ Μεγ. Ἡγεμόνα τοῦ Βλαδιμήρ στόν Δημήτριο Κωνσταντίνοβιτς, Ἡγεμόνα τοῦ Νίζνι Νόβγκοροντ. Ὁ Δημήτριος Κωνσταντίνοβιτς γεννήθηκε τό 1324 καί κατάγοταν ἀπό τήν οἰκογένεια τοῦ Μεγ. Ἡγεμόνα τοῦ Κιέβου Βσέβολοντ Γ. Τό 1359 ἡγεμόνευε στό Σούζνταλ καί τό 1365 στό Νίζνι Νόβγκοροντ. Ἰσχυρός ἡγεμόνας, προσπάθησε νά ἐξουδετερώσει τούς πειρατές πού λυμαίνονταν τήν λεκάνη τοῦ Βόλγα καί διεκδίκησε γιά τόν ἑαυτό του τήν Μεγ. Ἡγεμονία τοῦ Βλαδιμήρ, πράγμα πού πέτυχε τό 1360. Αὐτό τόν ἔφερε σέ σύγκρουση μέ τόν Δημήτριο Ἰβάνοβιτς, ἀλλά ὅταν τό 1363 ὁ Δημήτριος Κωνσταντίνοβιτς καθαιρέθηκε καί τίτλος ἀπονεμήθηκε στό Δημήτριο Ἰβάνοβιτς, ἐκεῖνος συνῆψε εἰρήνη μέ τόν ἀντίπαλό του καί νυμφεύθηκε τήν κόρη του Εὐδοκία (ὁσ. Εὐφροσύνη τῆς Μόσχας, + 1407), μέ τήν ὁποία ἀπέκτησε 12 παιδιά (μεταξύ αὐτῶν καί τόν Μεγ. Ἡγεμόνα Βασίλειο Α’). Ἔτσι ἀποφεύχθηκε ἕνας νέος ἐμφύλιος πόλεμος καί ἐνισχύθηκε ἡ ἑνωτική προσπάθεια γιά τήν ἀποτίναξη τοῦ Ταταρικοῦ ζυγοῦ.
Τό ἑπόμενο ἔτος 1367 ὁ Δημήτριος ὀχύρωσε τό Κρεμλίνο μέ πέτρινα τείχη, γεγονός πού ἐπέτρεψε στή Μόσχα νά ἀντιμετωπίσει δύο ἐπιθέσεις τῶν Λιθουανῶν (τό 1368 καί τό 1370). Τό 1376 οἱ ἑνωμένες κάτω ἀπό τήν ἡγεσία του Ρωσικές δυνάμεις νίκησαν τούς Βουλγάρους τοῦ κάτω Βόλγα. Ἐνισχυμένος ὁ Δημήτριος ἀπό τίς ἐπιτυχίες αὐτές καί ἐκμεταλευόμενος τίς ἐσωτερικές διαμάχες τῶν Τατάρων, ἀποπειράθηκε νά ἀποτινάξει τόν ζυγό τους ἀρνούμενος τήν πληρωμή τῶν φόρων. Σέ ἀπάντηση ὁ Χάν Μαμάϊ συμμάχησε μέ τούς Λιθουανούς καί εἰσέβαλε στή Ρωσία μέ στράτευμα 200.000 ἀνδρῶν. Ὁ Δημήτριος, μέ τήν εὐλογία τοῦ ἁγ. Σεργίου τοῦ Ραντονέζ, συγκρούσθηκε μαζί τους στήν περίφημη Μάχη τοῦ Κουλίκοβο Πόλ (Ἀγροῦ τῆς Μπεκάτσας), τήν 8η Σεπτεμβρίου 1380, ἐπικεφαλής στρατεύματος 150.000 ἀνδρῶν. Κατά τήν πλέον κρίσιμη στιγμή τῆς μάχης, πρίν οἱ Τάταροι ἑνωθοῦν μέ τούς Λιθουανούς, ὁ ὅσ. Σέργιος ἔστειλε στό Δημήτριο τήν εὐλογία του καί τήν διαβεβαίωση γιά τήν νίκη τῶν Χριστιανικῶν στρατευμάτων. Προηγουμένως εἰχε διαθέσει στό νεαρό Ἡγεμόνα δύο μοναχούς πρώην στρατιωτικούς, τόν Ἀλέξανδρο Περεσβέτ καί τόν Ἀνδρέα Ὀσλιάμπα.
Ἀνάμεσα σ’ αὐτούς πού ἔσπευσαν νά ἀγωνιστοῦν μαζί μέ τόν Πρίγκιπα Δημήτριο ἦταν καί οἱ Κοζάκοι τοῦ ποταμοῦ Ντόν, πού ἔφεραν μαζί τους μία παλαιά εἰκόνα τῆς Παναγίας, ἀπό τόν Ναό τῆς Παναγίας τοῦ Σιποτίν. Κατά τήν ὥρα τῆς συγκρούσεως ἡ εἰκόνα εἶχε ὑψωθεῖ σέ ἕνα ἀκόντιο καί δέσποζε τοῦ πεδίου τῆς μάχης, ἐνθαρρύνοντας τούς Χριστιανούς μαχητές.
Κατά τήν σύγκρουση ὁ Δημήτριος νίκησε τούς Τατάρους καί τούς κατέστρεψε ὁλοκληρωτικά. Ἡ νίκη αὐτή ἀπέδειξε στούς Ρώσους, ὅτι οἱ Τάταροι δέν ἦσαν ἀήττητοι καί ἀνέξειδε τόν Δημήτριο σέ ἐθνικό ἥρωα καί προστάτη τῆς Ρωσίας στόν ἀγῶνα γιά τήν ἐθνική ἀποκατάσταση.
Μετά τήν μάχη οἱ Κοζάκοι δώρησαν τήν εἰκόνα στόν νικητή ἅγ. Δημήτριο Ντόνσκοϊ καί αὐτός τήν κατέθεσε στόν Καθεδρικό Ναό τοῦ Εὐαγγελισμοῦ, στό Κρεμλίνο.
Ὅμως πέραν τῶν ἠθικῶν πλεονεκτημάτων ἡ Μάχη τοῦ Κουλίκοβο Πόλ δέν εἶχε πρακτικά ἀποτελέσματα, ἀφοῦ τό 1382 ὁ νέος Χάν Τοκτάμυς κατέλαβε καί πυρπόλησε τήν Μόσχα καί ὁ Δημήτριος ὑποχρεώθηκε νά διαφύγει στό βορρᾶ. Εἶναι ἄξιο σημειώσεως, ὅτι στήν εἰσβολή τοῦ Χάν Τοκτάμυς συμμετεῖχε καί ὁ παλαιός ἀντίπαλος τοῦ Δημητρίου Ντόνσκοϊ καί πεθερός του Δημήτριος Κωνσταντίνοβιτς, ὁ ὁποῖος μάλιστα ἔστειλε καί τούς γιούς του νά ὑπηρετήσουν στόν Ταταρικό στρατό! (Ὁ Δημ. Κωνσταντίνοβιτς ἀπεβίωσε τήν 5. 6. 1383).
Ἀργότερα στό σημεῖο τῆς μάχης καί πάνω στούς τάφους τῶν πεσόντων Ρώσων, ὁ Πρίγκιπας Δημήτριος ἵδρυσε τήν Μονή τῆς Γεννήσεως τῆς Θεοτόκου καί ταυτόχρονα ἐπέβαλλε τήν μνημόνευση τῶν ἐθνικῶν ἠρώων.
Ὁ Δημήτριος ἀπεβίωσε τήν 19. 5. 1389 σέ ἡλικία μόλις 39 ἐτῶν καί ἐνταφιάστηκε στόν Καθεδρικό Ναό τοῦ Ἀρχαγγέλου Μιχαήλ, ἀφήνοντας στό γιό καί διάδοχό του Βασίλειο Α’ διπλάσια ἐπικράτεια ἡγεμονίας ἀπό ἐκείνη πού εἶχε παραλάβει.
Ἡ ἁγιότητά του διακηρύχθηκε τό 1988 (μέ ἀφορμή τόν ἑορτασμό τῆς Χιλιετηρίδος τοῦ Βαπτίσματος τῶν Ρώσων, 988 - 1988), "σέ ἀναγνώριση τῶν ὑπηρεσιῶν του πρός τήν Ἐκκλησία καί τό Ἔθνος καί γιά τήν ταπεινή χριστιανική ζωή, θυσίας γιά τόν πλησίον του". Ἡ μνήμη του τιμᾶται τήν 19η Μαϊου.
Τό 1591 ἡ Παναγία τοῦ Ντόν βρέθηκε καί πάλι στό πεδίο τῆς μάχης, ὅταν ἡ Μόσχα πολιορκήθηκε ἀπό τούς Τατάρους τῆς Κριμαίας. Οἱ τότε ἐθνικοί καί ἐκκλησιαστικοί ἡγέτες τῆς Ρωσίας μέ ἐπικεφαλής τόν Τσάρο Θεόδωρο Α’ Ἰβάνοβιτς (1584 – 1598) καί τόν Πατριάρχη ἅγ. Ἰώβ (1587 – 1598), κάλεσαν τόν λαό νά προσευχηθεῖ μπροστά στήν εἰκόνα καί σύντομα οἱ εἰσβολεῖς ἀποκρούστηκαν, στή μάχη τοῦ ποταμοῦ Μόσκβα. Σέ ἀνάμνηση τῆς νίκης ἱδρύθηκε στό σημεῖο αὐτό ἡ περίφημη Μονή Ντόνσκοϊ.
Ἡ Παναγία τοῦ Ντόν εἶναι ἁγιογραφημένη κατά τήν τεχνοτροπία τοῦ περίφημου ἁγιογράφου Θεοφάνη τοῦ Ἕλληνα, δασκάλου τοῦ κορυφαίου Ρώσου ἁγιογράφου ἁγ. Ἀνδρέα Ρουμπλιώφ. Μέχρι τό 1930 ἦταν κατατεθημένη στήν Πινακοθήκη Τρετιάκωφ. Μετά τήν πτώση τοῦ κομμουνιστικοῦ καθεστώτος ἡ εἰκόνα ἀποδόθηκε στή Ρωσική Ἐκκλησία. Τιμᾶται τήν 19η Αὐγούστου.

Ἡ Παναγία τῆς Τόλγας
Ἡ εὕρεση τῆς θαυματουργῆς εἰκόνας τῆς Παναγίας τῆς Τόλγας, ἔγινε μέ τρόπο θαυμαστό τήν 8η Αὐγούστου 1314. Ὁ Ἐπίσκοπος τοῦ Γιαροσλάβ Πρόχορος (Μεγαλόσχημος Τρύφωνας), ἐπιστρέφοντας ἀπό μία περιοδεία στήν ἐπαρχία του, εἶχε κατασκηνώσει μέ τήν συνοδεία του στή συμβολή τοῦ ποταμοῦ Τόλγα μέ τόν μεγάλο ποταμό Βόλγα. Τήν νύκτα ἕνα ἐκτυφλωτικό φῶς ξύπνησε τόν ἐνάρετο Ἱεράρχη καί τόν ἀνάγκασε νά βγεῖ ἀπό τήν σκηνή του. Ἔκπληκτος τότε ὁ Πρόχορος ἀντίκρυσε μία στήλη φωτός στήν ἀπέναντι ὄχθη καί μία γέφυρα νά συνδέει τίς δύο πλευρές. Μέ πίστη ὁ Ἐπίσκοπος πέρασε τήν γέφυρα στηριζόμενος στή ράβδο του καί φθάνοντας στή στήλη τοῦ φωτός εἶδε νά αἰωρεῖται σέ ὕψος 10 περίπου ποδῶν μία εἰκόνα τῆς Παναγίας. Μετά ἀπό προσευχή ὁ Ἐπίσκοπος γύρισε ταραγμένος στήν κατασκήνωση, ξεχνῶντας πάνω στήν ταραχή του τήν ράβδο του στό σημεῖο τοῦ θαύματος. Ὅταν τό ἑπόμενο πρωϊ πληροφόρησε σχετικά τούς συνοδούς του, ἔκπλητκος διαπίστωσε ὅτι ἡ γέφυρα εἶχε χαθεπι, σέ πίστωση ὅμως τοῦ θαύματος, ὅταν πέρασαν ἀπέναντι μέ σχεδία, βρῆκαν τήν ράβδο μαζί μέ τήν εἰκόνα!
Στό σημεῖο τῆς εὑρέσεως ὑψώθηκε ἀμέσως ξύλινος ναός καί ἀργότερα δημιουργήθηκε μονή. Ἀπό τό 1392 θαυματουργό μῦρο ἄρχισε νά ρέει ἀπό τήν εἰκόνα. Ὁ τελευταῖος Ἡγούμενος τῆς μονῆς (καί ποιητής κανόνος πρός τήν Εἰκόνα), ἦταν ὁ μετέπειτα Ἱερομάρτυρας Ἐπίσκοπος Σεραφείμ τοῦ Οὔγκλιτς.
Ἡ Παναγία τῆς Τόλγας ἀνῆκει στόν εἰκονογραφικό τύπο τῆς Ἐλεούσας καί ἑορτάζει τήν ἡμέρα τῆς εὑρέσεώς της (8η Αὐγούστου). Στήν Πινακοθήκη Τρετιάκωφ σώζεται ἀντίγραφό της τοῦ 13ου αἰ., τῆς Σχολῆς τοῦ Ἀλμπάτωφ.

Ἡ Παναγία τοῦ Καζάν
Ἡ περισσότερο δημοφιλής Θεομητορική εἰκόνα ἀνάμεσα στόν Ὀρθόδοξο Ρωσικό λαό, ἐφέστια εἰκόνα τῆς παραδοσιακῆς Ρωσικῆς οἰκογενείας, μέ τήν ὁποία συνήθως εὐλογοῦνται οἱ ἀρραβῶνες. Εἰκονίζει τό σεπτό πρόσωπο τῆς Θεοτόκου νά στρέφεται τρυφερά πρός τόν Υἱό Της, ὁ Ὁποῖος βρίσκεται σέ ὄρθια θέση καί εὐλογεῖ.
Ἡ Παναγία τοῦ Καζάν ἐμφανίζεται στή Ρωσική ἐθνική καί ἐκκλησιαστική Ἱστορία τόν 16ο αἰ., λίγο μετά τήν κατάληψη τοῦ μέχρι τότε Ταταρικοῦ Καζάν ἀπό τόν Τσάρο Ἰβάν Δ’ τόν Τρομερό (1547 – 1584). Ὅπως συνέβαινε σέ παρόμοιες περιπτώσεις, τήν ἀπαλλαγή ἀπό τήν κυριαρχία τῶν Τατάρων ἀκολούθησε σημαντική ἱεραποστολική ἐργασία ἀπό τόν πρῶτο Ἐπίσκοπο τῆς πόλεως ἅγ. Γουρία.
Ὁ ἅγ. Γουρίας ἦταν γόνος ἀριστοκρατικῆς οἰκογενείας ἀπό τό Ραντονέζ καί ὑπηρέτησε κοντά στόν Πρίγκιπα Ἰβάν Πενκώφ. Κατά τήν διάρκεια κάποιας διαμάχης τοῦ Πρίγκιπα μέ τήν σύζυγό του, ὁ νέος συκοφαντήθηκε καί φυλακίσθηκε, ἀλλά στή φυλακή ἔδειξε τήν ποιότητα τοῦ χαρακτήρα του, ἀφοῦ ἀφιέρωσε τόν χρόνο του στή συγγραφή παιδικῶν βιβλίων! Μόνασε στή Μονή τοῦ ἁγ. Ἰωσήφ τοῦ Βολοκολάμσκ, τῆς ὁποίας ἀναδείχθηκε Ἡγούμενος, τό 1543. Ἡγουμένευσε 9 χρόνια καί μετά ἡσύχασε, μέχρι τόν διορισμό του στή Μονή Ἁγίας Τριάδος Σελιζχάρωφ, τῆς Ἐπισκοπῆς Τβέρ.
Τό 1552, ὅταν καταλήφθηκε τό Ταταροκρατούμενο Καζάν, ὁ Τσάρος Ἰβάν ἵδρυσε τήν ὁμώνυμη Ἀρχιεπισκοπή. Τό 1555 ὁ Ἅγιος ἐκλέχθηκε "διά κλήρου" πρῶτος Ἐπίσκοπός της. Στά ὀκτώ χρόνια τῆς ἀρχιερατείας του, μέ τήν βοήθεια τοῦ ἁγ. Βαρσανουφίου Ἐπισκόπου Τβέρ (+ 1576, 11η Ἀπριλίου), τότε Ἀρχιμανδρίτου, ἀνέπτυξε σημαντική ἱεραποστολική δραστηριότητα. Ἵδρυσε 4 Μονές καί ἔκτισε τόν Καθεδρικό Ναό τοῦ Εὐαγγελισμοῦ καί πλέον τῶν 10 ἐνοριακῶν Ναῶν.
Τό 1561 ἀσθένησε καί δέχθηκε τό Μεγάλο καί Ἀγγελικό Σχῆμα. Κοιμήθηκε τό 1563 καί ἐνταφιάσθηκε στή Μονή Μεταμορφώσεως (τήν ὁποία εἶχε ἱδρύσει ὁ ἅγ. Βαρσανούφιος καί ἐνταφιάσθηκε καί ὁ ἴδιος).
Τό 1595, ὁ τότε Μητροπολίτης Καζάν καί ἔπειτα Πατριάρχης Μόσχας ἅγ. Ἑρμογένης, ἀνακόμισε ἀδιάφθορα τά Λείψανα καί τῶν δύο Ἁγίων. Τό 1630, τό εὐωδιαστό Λείψανο τοῦ ἁγ. Γουρία μεταφέρθηκε στόν Καθεδρικό Ναό τοῦ Εὐαγγελισμοῦ, ὅπου καί σήμερα φυλάσσεται.
Ἡ μνήμη του τιμᾶται τήν 5η Δεκεμβρίου καί ἡ Ἀνακομιδή τοῦ Λειψάνου του τήν 4η Ὀκτωβρίου.
Ἡ εὕρεση τῆς Παναγίας τοῦ Καζάν ἔγινε κάτω ἀπό τίς ἀκόλουθες συνθῆκες: Ὅταν μία τυχαῖα πυρκαγιά κατέστρεψε τό Κρεμλίνο τῆς πόλεως, τά λαϊκά στρώματα – στά ὁποῖα ἦταν βαθειά ριζωμένος ὁ Μωαμεθανισμός – ἀπέδοσαν τό γεγονός στήν ὀργή τοῦ «Προφήτου» Μωάμεθ. Τότε ἀκριβῶς ἡ πρόνοια τοῦ Θεοῦ οἰκονόμησε τήν εὕρεση τῆς περιώνυμης - ἔκτοτε – εἰκόνας τοῦ Καζάν, γιά τήν στήριξη τῆς ἀληθινῆς πίστεως.
Μία νύκτα ἀμέσως μετά τήν πυρκαγιά ἡ Κυρία Θεοτόκος ἐμφανίσθηκε σέ ἕνα νεαρό κορίτσι, τήν Ματρώνα, καί τήν διέταξε νά μεταφέρει στόν ἅγιο Ποιμενάρχη τῆς πόλεως μία ἐντολή Της: Ἔπρεπε
νά σκάψουν σέ συγκεκριμένο σημεῖο, γιά νά βροῦν μία θαμμένη εἰκόνα Της. Ὅταν τό ὅραμα ἐμφανίσθηκε γιά τρίτη φορά, ἡ μητέρα τῆς Ματρώνας ἀναγκάστηκε νά ἐνημερώσει τόν ἅγ. Γουρία. Ὁ ἐνάρετος Ἐπίσκοπο ὑπάκουσε στή Θεομητορική ἐντολή καί τέθηκε ἐπικεφαλής τῶν Χριστιανῶν κατοίκων οἱ ὁποῖοι ἔσκαψαν καί βρῆκαν σέ βάθος τριῶν ποδῶν μία θαυμάσια εἰκόνα τῆς Παναγίας με΄ λαμπερά χρώματα, πού φαίνοταν σάν νά εἶχε βγεῖ τήν στιγμή ἐκείνη ἀπό τό ἐργαστήριο τοῦ ἁγιογράφου! Ὁ ἅγ. Γουρίας μετέφερε λιτανευτικά τήν εἰκόνα στόν παρακείμενο ναό τοῦ ἁγ. Νικολάου, τοῦ ὁποίου ἐφημέριος ἦταν ὁ ἔπειτα Ἱερομάρτυρας Πατριάρχης Μόσχας ἅγ. Ἑρμογένης (1606 – 1612). Τήν ἴδια ἡμέρα ἄρχισε ἡ μεγάλη σειρά τῶν θαυμάτων τῆς Παναγίας τοῦ Καζάν, μέ πρῶτο τήν θεραπεία τοῦ τυφλοῦ Ἰωσήφ.
Κατά τήν Περίοδο τῶν Ταραχῶν (1598 – 1613) - τήν περίοδο τῆς Ρωσικῆς Ἱστορίας ἀπό τόν θάνατο τοῦ Τσάρου Θεοδώρου Α’ Ἰβάνοβιτς (1598), μέχρι τήν ἀνάδειξη τοῦ Τσάρου Μιχαήλ Ρωμανώφ (1613), κατά τήν ὁποία ἡ Ρωσία βρέθηκε στή δύνη τῆς ἀναρχίας καί τῆς ξένης (Πολωνικῆς) κατοχῆς - τό γόητρο τοῦ Ρωσικοῦ Κράτους σώθηκε ἀπό τόν ἡρωϊκό Πατριάρχη ἅγ. Ἑρμογένη. Ἀρνούμενος νά συνεργαστεῖ μέ τούς κατακτητές καί τούς συνεργάτες τους, πέθανε στή φυλακή ἀπό ἀσιτία, τήν 17η Φεβρουαρίου 1612. Τόν ἴδιο χρόνο - σάν ἀποτέλεσμα τοῦ κηρύγματός του καί τῶν ποιμαντικῶν του ἐπιστολῶν - ἦρθε ἀπό τόν Βόλγα ἕνας στρατός ἐθελοντῶν, κάτω ἀπό τήν ἡγεσία τοῦ λαϊκοῦ Κοσμᾶ Μίνιν ἀπό τό Νίζνι Νόβγκοροντ καί τοῦ Πρίγκιπα Δημ. Ποζάρσκυ, ἐπικεφαλῆς τοῦ ὁποίου εἶχε τεθεῖ ἡ θαυματουργός Εἰκόνα τῆς Παναγίας τοῦ Καζάν. Τήν 22α Ὀκτωβρίου ἐλευθερώθηκε ἡ Μόσχα καί τήν 26η τό Κρεμλῖνο. Ἡ νίκη τῶν Ρώσων κατά τῶν Πολωνῶν ἀποδόθηκε στήν προστασία τῆς Ὑπεραγίας Θεοτόκου. Τόν ἴδιο χρόνο, σέ ἀνάμνησι τοῦ γεγονότος αὐτοῦ, ὁ Τσάρος Μιχαήλ Θεοδώροβιτς (1613 – 1645), ὁ πρῶτος τῆς Δυναστείας τῶν Ρωμανώφ, θέσπισε δύο ἑορτές πρός τιμήν τῆς εἰκόνας τοῦ Καζάν: Τήν Ἰουλίου (Εὕρεση) καί τήν 22α Ὀκτωβρίου (ἀπελευθέρωση τῆς Μόσχας ἀπό τούς Πολωνούς).
Πρός τιμήν τῆς Παναγίας τοῦ Καζάν ὑπῆρχε στήν Κόκκινη Πλατεία τῆς Μόσχας περίφημος Καθεδρικός Ναός, στόν ὁποῖο ἦταν κατατεθημένη ἡ εἰκόνα. Κατά τόν Ἀρχιεπίσκοπο Συρακουςῶν καί Ἁγίας Τριάδος Ἀβέρκιο (τῆς Ρωσικῆς Ὀρθοδόξου Ἐκκλησίας τῆς Διασπορᾶς), μία παράδοση ἔλεγε, ὅτι ὅσο ὑπῆρχε ἡ εἰκόνα, ἡ Ρωσία θά εἶχε εἰρήνη στήν Ἀνατολή. Τό 1905 ἡ εἰκόνα χάθηκε μέ ἐντελῶς ἀνεξήγητο τρόπο καί ἀμέσως ξέσπασε ὁ ἀτυχής γιά τήν Ρωσία πόλεμος μέ τήν Ἰαπωνία! Ἀκολούθησε ὁ Α’ Παγκόσμιος Πόλεμος καί ἡ Ἐπανάσταση τοῦ 1917. Τό περίεργο στό θέμα εἶναι, ὅτι ἐνῶ βρέθηκαν τά πολύτιμα ἀφιερώματα καί κοσμήματα τῆς εἰκόνας, ἡ ἴδια ἡ εἰκόνα δέν βρέθηκε ποτέ, σάν κάποιος νά τήν ἐξαφάνισε γιά συγκεκριμένο λόγο!
Τόν Καθεδρικό Ναό τῆς Παναγίας τοῦ Καζάν στήν Κόκκινη Πλατεία κατεδάφισε τό 1937 ὁ Στάλιν γιά νά δημιουργηθεῖ χῶρος γιά δημόσια ἀποχωρητήρια! Μετά τήν πτώση τοῦ κομμουνιστικοῦ καθεστώτος (1989), ὁ ναός ἐπανακτίσθηκε στό ἴδιο σημεῖο, χάρις στά σχέδια πού εἶχε διασώσει ὁ Πέτρος Μπαρανόφσκυ (ἀρχιτέκτονας πού διαφωνοῦσε μέ τόν Στάλιν στό θέμα τῆς κατεδαφίσεως ναῶν). Ὁ νέος ναός ἐγκαινιάστηκε τόν Νοέμβριο τοῦ 1993 ἀπό τόν Πατριάρχη Ἀλέξιο Β’, παρουσία τοῦ τότε Προέδρου τῆς Ρωσικῆς Ὁμοσπονδίας Μπόρις Γιέλτσιν (Περιοδικό “Frontier”, φ, Ἰανουαρίου – Φεβρουαρίου 1994, σελ. 5).
Τῆς Παναγίας τοῦ Καζάν μνημονεύονται 60 περίπου θαυματουργά ἀντίγραφα. Περισσότερο γνωστά εἶναι ἐκεῖνα τοῦ Γιαροσλάβ, τοῦ Ταμπώφ, τοῦ Τομπόλσκ, τοῦ Νιζνιελόμωφ καί τοῦ Καπλουνώφ. Τό θαυματουργό ἀντίγραφο τῆς Μόσχας φυλάσσεται κατατεθημένο στόν Πατριαρχικό Ναό τῶν Ἐπιφανίων (Σόλωνος Νινίκα, «Ἡ Ἐκκλησία τῆς Ρωσίας καί ἡ Περεστρόϊκα», σελ. 163). Τό εὑρύτατα γνωστό θαυματουργό ἀντίγραφο τῆς Ἁγίας Πετρουπόλεως μετά τήν Ἐπανάσταση τοῦ 1917 ἔγινε κτῆμα διαφόρων καί τελικά κατέληξε στό μεγάλο Θεοημητορικό προσκύνημα τῶν Παπικῶν στήν Φατίμα τῆς Πορτογαλίας, ὅπου καί σήμερα φυλάσσεται.
Στό Ἅγιο Ὄρος, στή Ρωσική Μονή τοῦ ἁγ. Παντελεήμονος, φυλάσσεται ἀντίγραφο μεγάλης καλλιτεχνικῆς καί κειμηλιακῆς ἀξίας.
Στήν Ἑλλάδα, παλαιά Ρωσική εἰκόνα τῆς Παναγίας τοῦ Καζάν πού εὐωδιάζει, φυλάσσεται στό Καθολικό τῆς Ἱερᾶς Μονῆς Παναγίας Κερατέας Ἀττικῆς. Ἐπίσης, στό Παρεκκλήσιο τῆς ὁσ. Ξένης τῆς Ρωσίδος Μάνδρας Ἀττικῆς, φυλάσσεται ἀντίγραφο τῆς Παναγίας τοῦ Καζάν ἀναγόμενο στόν 18ο αἰ. καί ἄλλο στό ναό Κοιμ. Θεοτόκου Καλιθέας Ἀττικῆς.

Ἡ Παναγία τῆς Γεωργίας
Ἀνῆκει στόν εἰκονογραφικό τύπο τῆς Ὁδηγητρίας καί ἔχει πολλές ὁμοιότητες μέ τήν Παναγία τοῦ Τιχβίν. Μέχρι τόν 17ο αἰ. βρίσκοταν στή Γεωργία, ἀπ’ ὅπου καί ὀνομάστηκε. Ὅταν τό 1622 οἱ Πέρσες κατέλαβαν τήν Γεωργία, ἀνάμεσα στά λάφυρα πού ἀφαίρεσαν ἦταν καί πολλά ἐκκλησιαστικά κειμήλια, τά ὁποῖα πῆραν μέ σκοπό νά τά πουλήσουν στούς Ὀρθόδοξους Ρώσους πού ζοῦσαν στήν Περσία. Ἀνάμεσα στά κειμήλια αὐτά ἦταν καί ἡ ἔπειτα γνωστή Παναγία τῆς Γεωργίας, εἰκόνα παλαιά, διακοσμημένη μέ χρυσό καί ἀσήμι.
Ἡ εἰκόνα αὐτή ἀγοράστηκε ἀπό τόν Ρῶσο Στέφανο Λαζάρεφ, πράκτορα τοῦ ἐμπόρου Λίτκιν ἀπό τό Γιαροσλάβ. Τήν ἴδια στιγμή μέ ἐκείνη τῆς ἀγορᾶς, ὁ Λίτκιν πληροφορήθηκε μέ ὄνειρο, ὅτι ὁ συγκεκριμένος ὑπάλληλός του εἶχε ἀγοράσει μία εἰκόνα, ἡ ὁποία ἔπρεπε νά ἀφιερωθεῖ στή Μονή Κρασνογκόρσκ (πού εἶχε ἱδρυθεῖ τό 1603 στίς ὄχθες τοῦ ποταμοῦ Πίνεγκα, στήν περιοχή τοῦ Ἀρχαγγέλου). Μή γνωρίζοντας τι νά πράξει ὁ Λίτκιν λησμόνησε τήν ὑπόθεση, μέχρις ὅτου ἐπέστρεψε στή Ρωσία ὁ Λαζάρεφ (τό 1629), φέρνοντας μαζί του καί τήν εἰκόνα. Ἀμέσως τότε ἡ εἰκόνα κατατέθηκε στή Μονή Κασνογκόρσκ καί κατά τήν διάρκεια τῆς ἀγρυπνίας ὑποδοχῆς της ἐπιτελέστηκε τό πρῶτο θαῦμα, ὅταν ὁ μοναχός Πιτιρίμ, τυφλός ἀπό χρόνια, θεραπεύθηκε θαυματουργικά. Ἀκολούθησαν ἄλλα θαύματα καί τό 1650 ὁ τότε Μητροπολίτης Νόβγκοροντ καί ἔπειτα Πατριάρχης Μόσχας Νίκων, θέσπισε τήν ἑορτή τῆς εἰκόνας τήν 22α Αὐγούστου, ἡμέρα ἀφίξεώς της στή μονή.
Τό 1654 ἡ εἰκόνα μεταφέρθηκε στή Μόσχα γιά καθαρισμό. Τότε ὁ ἀργυροτεχνίτης Γαβριήλ Εὐδοκίμωφ ζήτησε ἀπό τόν μοναχό πού τήν συνόδευε, νά μεταφερθεῖ ἡ εἰκόνα στό σπίτι του καί νά ψαλλεῖ μία Παράκλησι γιά τόν ἄρρωστο γιό του. Μετά τήν θαυματουργική θεραπεία τοῦ παιδιοῦ, ὁ Εὐδοκίμωφ ἁγιογράφησε ἕνα ἀντίγραφο τῆς εἰκόνας καί τό ἁφιέρωσε στό Ναό τῆς Ἁγίας Τριάδος, κοντά στήν Πύλη τῆς ἁγ. Βαρβάρας. Τό ἀντίγραφο αὐτό ἀναδείχθηκε ἐπίσης θαυματουργό, σέ σημεῖο νά προκληθεῖ τό ἐνδιαφέρον τῶν Ἀνακτόρων. Ἔτσι, τήν 12η Ἀπριλίου 1900, ἐπισκέφθηκε τόν ναό καί προσκύνησε τήν εἰκόνα τό τελευταῖο Αὐτοκρατορικό ζεῦγος τῆς Ρωσίας, ὁ Τσάρος Νικόλαος Β’ καί ἡ Τσαρίνα Ἀλεξάνδρα.

Ἡ Παναγία τοῦ Σουϊσκ
Ἡ ἱστορία τῆς εἰκόνας τοῦ Σουϊσκ ἀρχίζει στά μέσα τοῦ 17ου αί., ὅταν ἡ Ρωσία ὑπέφερε ἀπό λοιμώδη νόσο. Στήν πόλη Σουϊσκ πού εἶχε πληγεῖ ἰδιαίτερα, οἱ κάτοικοι - ἀφοῦ ἔχασαν κάθε ἐλπίδα γιά ἀνθρώπινη βοήθεια – στράφηκαν ὁλοκληρωτικά στό Θεό καί μέ ὁλονυκτίες καί δεήσεις ζητοῦσαν τό ἔλεός Του.
Τήν περίοδο ἐκείνη οἱ ἐνορίτες τοῦ Ναοῦ τῆς Ἀναστάσεως, εἶχαν παραγγείλει σέ ἕναν ἐνάρετο ἀσκητή ἁγιογράφο, ἕνα ἀντίγραφο τῆς Ὁδηγητρίας τοῦ Σμολένσκ. Εὐσεβεῖς ἄνθρωποι ὅπως ἦταν, νήστεψαν ὅλη τήν ἑβδομάδα τῆς ἁγιογραφήσεως, προσευχήθηκαν καί ἀφοῦ ἐξομολογήθηκαν καί κοινώνησαν τῶν Ἀχράντων Μυστηρίων, πῆγαν μέ τόν ἐφημέριό τους νά τήν παραλάβουν. Ἀπό τήν στιγμή τῆς παραλαβῆς τῆς εἰκόνας ἡ ἐπιδημία ἄρχισε σταδιακά νά ὑποχωρεῖ, ἀρχικά στήν ἐνορία τῆς Ἀναστάσεως καί στή συνέχεια καί στήν ὑπόλοιπη πόλη!
Ἡ Παναγία τοῦ Σουϊσκ ἀναδείχθηκε πολύ θαυματουργή. Ἕνας κατάλογος θαυμάτων πού ἄρχισε ἀπό τότε νά τηρεῖται, σύντομα κατέγραψε 117 περιπτώσεις, ἀπό τίς ὁποίες οἱ 7 ἀφοροῦσαν θεραπείες παραλυτικῶν!
Ἡ εἰκόνα τιμᾶται τήν 2α Νοεμβρίου (σέ ἀνάμνηση τῆς ἀπαλλαγῆς ἀπό τήν νόσο), τήν 18η Ἰουλίου καί ἐπίσης τήν 28η Ἰουλίου (σέ ἀνάμνηση ἀπαλλαγῆς ἀπό χολέρα, τό 1831), τήν Τρίτη τοῦ Πάσχα καί τήν πρώτη Κυριακή τῆς Νηστείας τῶν Ἁγίων Ἀποστόλων.